-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GPU Memory - Massive Issue #38
Comments
Hi. It looks like I am facing the same issue as you. However, I tried to make some changes, not sure if it would help you. |
Hi, 4090 has 24GB GPU memory and it should be enough to run mip-nerf 360 dataset. @Fanie-Visagie are you using different dataset? Or you could change |
@niujinshuchong Hi, thank you so much for your help. When I train 360_v2, I use "python scripts/run_mipnerf360.py ",should I try others? Or should I change the parameter 0.05 to 0.5 or back to 0.005 on line 163 of train.py ? |
Yes, of course you can still change the parameter to use less gaussians. If you process your data with colmap, you can train it directly. |
yeah not quite...I am using 200 photos of my own dataset trained through colmap. every other library does this in 30 min. Yours spikes (even with allocating imagery to the cpu) between 2000 and 3000 iterations. Then the GPU maxes out ?? I to am running a 4090 with 24gb of ram...just using the bicycle is not testing, you need to please test other datasets as well if this library is to become common places for users, instead of 3DGS... |
@Aur1anna appreciate if we can catchup to swap notes. do you have weChat ?? |
yeah,maybe you can add me with gqs3290024845. |
I encountered the same problem, training an 8-fold down sampled bicycle dataset on 3090, but encountered OOM issues. However, I found it easy to train this dataset using other models. Was there a step where too much memory was allocated? |
Work is needed on the GOU memory allocation. Cant get any results as compared to original paper as GPU memory max's out way to quickly.
Suggest to have another go basis using latest 3dgs implementation with your code revision....
Hope this helps...
It looks good, but cant use this at all or even see results...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: