feat: include grant type error #144
Conversation
This includes grant type error information that may be necessary to debug an invalid grant type.
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the error handling logic in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AccessRequestHandler
participant TokenEndpointHandler
Client->>AccessRequestHandler: Send Access Request
AccessRequestHandler->>TokenEndpointHandler: Validate Request
alt Token Endpoint Found
TokenEndpointHandler-->>AccessRequestHandler: Process Request
AccessRequestHandler-->>Client: Return Access Token
else Token Endpoint Not Found
AccessRequestHandler-->>Client: Return ErrInvalidRequest with details
end
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
access_request_handler.go (1)
108-110: Approve the enhanced error message with a minor suggestion.The change significantly improves the error message by including the client ID and requested grant types, which aligns well with the PR objective of enhancing debugging for invalid grant types. This additional context will be valuable for troubleshooting issues related to unsupported or misconfigured grant types.
A minor suggestion for improved readability:
Consider breaking the long line into multiple lines for better readability. Here's a suggested format:
return nil, errorsx.WithStack(ErrInvalidRequest.WithDebugf( "The client with id '%s' requested grant type '%s' which is invalid, unknown, not supported, or not configured to be handled.", accessRequest.GetRequestForm().Get(consts.FormParameterClientID), strings.Join(accessRequest.GetGrantTypes(), " "), ))This change doesn't affect functionality but improves code readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- access_request_handler.go (1 hunks)
- access_request_handler_test.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
access_request_handler_test.go (6)
49-54: Improved test case with more detailed error handlingThe changes in this test case enhance the error handling and provide more specific information about the invalid grant type. The addition of the mock expectation for
GetClientalso improves the test coverage.These modifications align well with the PR objective of including grant type error information for debugging purposes.
67-67: Enhanced error message for empty client ID scenarioThe error message has been updated to provide more specific information about the invalid grant type when the client ID is empty. This change improves the clarity of the error and aids in debugging.
This modification aligns with the PR objective of including more detailed grant type error information.
Line range hint
1-1: Overall improvements in test coverage and error handlingThe changes made in this file significantly enhance the test suite for the
NewAccessRequestfunction. The modifications consistently improve error messaging and test coverage related to grant types and client authentication. The new test cases,TestNewAccessRequestWithoutClientAuthandTestNewAccessRequestWithMixedClientAuth, address important edge cases that were previously not covered.These improvements align perfectly with the PR objective of incorporating error information related to grant types and enhancing the debugging process. The more detailed error messages and expanded test coverage will greatly assist in identifying and resolving issues related to invalid grant types and client authentication scenarios.
Great work on improving the robustness and reliability of the OAuth2 provider!
Line range hint
1-1: New test case for scenarios with mixed client authentication requirementsThe addition of
TestNewAccessRequestWithMixedClientAuthis an excellent enhancement to the test suite. This test case covers complex scenarios where different handlers have different client authentication requirements, which significantly improves the overall test coverage and helps identify potential issues in such situations.This new test aligns perfectly with the PR objective of improving the debugging process by covering more edge cases and potential real-world scenarios related to grant types and client authentication.
To confirm the location and content of this new test case, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the new test case "TestNewAccessRequestWithMixedClientAuth" rg -n "func TestNewAccessRequestWithMixedClientAuth" -A 10 access_request_handler_test.go
Line range hint
1-1: New test case for scenarios without client authenticationThe addition of
TestNewAccessRequestWithoutClientAuthis a valuable improvement to the test suite. This test case covers scenarios where client authentication is optional, which enhances the overall test coverage and helps identify potential issues in such situations.This new test aligns well with the PR objective of improving the debugging process by covering more edge cases related to grant types and client authentication.
To confirm the location and content of this new test case, please run the following command:
Line range hint
1-1: Improved test case for bad client secret scenarioThe changes in this test case enhance the error handling and provide more specific information about the authentication failure due to an incorrect client secret. The addition of the mock expectation for retrieving the client also improves the test coverage.
These modifications align well with the PR objective of including more detailed error information for debugging purposes.
Could you please provide the specific line numbers for these changes? This will help in precisely locating and reviewing the modifications.
This includes grant type error information that may be necessary to debug an invalid grant type.