Couple of minor points and rerender

04-beyond-borders.Rmd

@@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ Though the underlying models are ultimately similar, that is a continuous Matér
 Nonetheless, it would be of value to confirm this empirically.
 
 <!-- * Discussion of the overall area versus point question. Papers of Sam using point level. -->
-This chapter used area-level models to for point-level data throughout.
+This chapter used area-level models to for data which arises by aggregation of point-level data.
 However, @konstantinoudis2020discrete found that using a point-level LGCP model rather than an area-level BYM model may have significant benefits.
 The work in this chapter does not address the broader question of under which circumstances use of an area or point-level model is sensible.
 
@@ -770,8 +770,8 @@ Previous spatial random effect comparison studies [@best2005comparison; @lee2011
 Use of the DIC is strongly discouraged by @vehtari2017practical.
 This study used less flawed measures of model performance, such as the cross-validated CRPS.
 It would be beneficial to compute the DIC and WAIC in Section \@ref(hiv-study) as a comparison.
-Additionally, the measures presented in this work are disaggregated by area.
-With refinements to the sample sizes used, these disaggregated measures could enable nuanced findings about spatial random effect models.
+Additionally, the measures used in this study were computed and presented by individual area.
+With refinements to the sample sizes used, these area-specific measures of performance could enable more nuanced conclusions about the use of spatial random effect models.
 
 Cross-validation was performed using $\rho$ as the forecasting target, rather than $y$ as is typical.
 This decision was made because applied interest is in forecasting HIV prevalence at a district level, not forecasting the outcome of a household survey.

corrections/corrections.Rmd

@@ -288,11 +288,14 @@ Changed, thank you!
 
 > *67: "This chapter used of area-level models to for point-level data throughout". I can't parse this. You can only use point level model if have point level data.*
 
-Not yet resolved.
+I have altered the sentence as follows:
+"This chapter used area-level models to for data which arises by aggregation of point-level data."
 
 > *67: "measures are disaggregated by area" - not sure of the point here.*
 
-Not yet resolved.
+I have altered the text to clarify the point:
+"Additionally, the measures used in this study were computed and presented by individual area.
+With refinements to the sample sizes used, these area-specific measures of performance could enable more nuanced conclusions about the use of spatial random effect models."
 
 ### Chapter 5
 
@@ -316,7 +319,8 @@ Not yet resolved.
 
 > *77: Table 5.2: phi_{ik} should be u_{ik}.*
 
-Good spot! Thank you, fixed.
+Good spot!
+Thank you, fixed.
 
 > *80: Mention country-specific vs single models earlier.*