Replies: 1 comment
-
@RemLampa sorry for the late reply. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello everyone!
We are trying to implement schema stitching on a couple of remote schemas.
One remote schema is quite massive. Introspection result alone is 11MB. We apply a few transforms on it to fit our needs, as the schema is autogenerated (Drupal).
Problem is the whole thing results in a startup time of about 20-30secs, which we found about 90% is due to
stitchSchemas
. Not to mention the huge spike in processing power.We're planning on just combining the transforms into a single massive one since we're thinking each transform = one schema traversal, many transforms = many schema traversals. Are we right in taking this approach?
Also curious about how others tackle similar situations.
Thanks, everyone!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions