-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
batching handleActionUpdates #38266
base: release
Are you sure you want to change the base?
batching handleActionUpdates #38266
Conversation
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Saga as Evaluation Saga
participant Worker as Evaluation Worker
participant Actions as Redux Actions
Saga->>Actions: Listen for evaluation actions
Actions-->>Saga: Receive action updates
Saga->>Saga: Buffer action updates
Saga->>Worker: Dispatch buffered actions
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/client/src/sagas/EvaluationsSaga.ts (2)
545-546
: Consider adding type definition for collectedHandleUpdatesThe variable should have a more specific type than
any
to ensure type safety.- // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any - let collectedHandleUpdates: any = []; + let collectedHandleUpdates: Array<ActionDataPayload> = [];
787-787
: Review the delay durationThe 500ms delay might be too long for action processing. Consider making this configurable or reducing it based on performance metrics.
- yield delay(500); + const ACTION_PROCESSING_DELAY = process.env.ACTION_PROCESSING_DELAY || 200; + yield delay(ACTION_PROCESSING_DELAY);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts
(0 hunks)app/client/src/sagas/EvaluationsSaga.ts
(3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/client/src/sagas/ActionExecution/PluginActionSaga.ts
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/src/sagas/EvaluationsSaga.ts (1)
Line range hint 551-593
: Verify the buffer clearing logic
The buffer clearing logic in the take
function looks correct, but we should ensure that all buffered updates are processed before clearing.
✅ Verification successful
Buffer clearing logic is properly synchronized with action processing
The implementation is safe because:
- The buffer (
collectedHandleUpdates
) is only cleared intake()
after its contents are saved torespCollectedHandleUpdates
- New updates are only collected when
UPDATE_ACTION_DATA
actions arrive with payload - The
canTake
flag ensures atomic buffer operations - The evaluation channel processes actions sequentially in the saga loop
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any potential race conditions in action processing
rg -A 5 "UPDATE_ACTION_DATA.*actionDataPayload"
Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the action type and buffer processing logic
rg -A 10 "ReduxActionTypes\.UPDATE_ACTION_DATA" app/
# Check for any other places where collectedHandleUpdates is modified
rg -A 5 "collectedHandleUpdates" app/
# Look for the shouldProcessAction implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function shouldProcessAction($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4303
[...EVAL_AND_LINT_REDUX_ACTIONS, ReduxActionTypes.UPDATE_ACTION_DATA], | ||
evalQueueBuffer(), | ||
); | ||
|
||
while (true) { | ||
const action: EvaluationReduxAction<unknown | unknown[]> = | ||
yield take(evtActionChannel); | ||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any | ||
const action: any = yield take(evtActionChannel); | ||
|
||
if (action?.actionDataPayload?.length) { | ||
yield call( | ||
evalWorker.request, | ||
EVAL_WORKER_ACTIONS.UPDATE_ACTION_DATA, | ||
action.actionDataPayload, | ||
); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding error handling for evalWorker requests
The worker request for updating action data should include error handling to prevent silent failures.
if (action?.actionDataPayload?.length) {
+ try {
yield call(
evalWorker.request,
EVAL_WORKER_ACTIONS.UPDATE_ACTION_DATA,
action.actionDataPayload,
);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to update action data:', error);
+ // Consider dispatching an error action here
+ }
}
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true |
Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12428901421. |
Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-38266.dp.appsmith.com |
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
Issue Number
or
Fixes
Issue URL
Warning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed.
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12427297344
Commit: c0e1115
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.All
Spec:
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
Fri, 20 Dec 2024 10:21:10 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor