-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
improve broker selector utils #14733
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
943e1eb
improve broker selector utils
gortiz 03ed9b3
add headers
gortiz 7a6ad73
improve assertions in BrokerSelectorUtilsTest
gortiz 83994c5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into better-broker-selec…
gortiz 80365fb
fix error in javadoc
gortiz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
121 changes: 121 additions & 0 deletions
121
...inot-java-client/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/client/utils/BrokerSelectorUtilsTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ | ||
/** | ||
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
* or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
* distributed with this work for additional information | ||
* regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
* to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
* "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
* with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
* | ||
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, | ||
* software distributed under the License is distributed on an | ||
* "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY | ||
* KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | ||
* specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
* under the License. | ||
*/ | ||
package org.apache.pinot.client.utils; | ||
|
||
import java.util.HashMap; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
import java.util.Set; | ||
import org.testng.Assert; | ||
import org.testng.annotations.AfterMethod; | ||
import org.testng.annotations.Test; | ||
|
||
|
||
public class BrokerSelectorUtilsTest { | ||
|
||
HashMap<String, List<String>> _brokerData = new HashMap<>(); | ||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersSetNullTables() { | ||
Set<String> tableSet = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokersSet(null, _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableSet, Set.of()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersListNullTables() { | ||
List<String> tableList = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokers(null, _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertNull(tableList); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersSetEmptyTables() { | ||
Set<String> tableSet = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokersSet(List.of(), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableSet, Set.of()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersListEmptyTables() { | ||
List<String> tableList = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokers(List.of(), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertNull(tableList); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersSetNotExistentTable() { | ||
Set<String> tableSet = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokersSet(List.of("notExistent"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableSet, Set.of()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersListNotExistentTable() { | ||
List<String> tableList = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokers(List.of("notExistent"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertNull(tableList); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersSetOneTable() { | ||
_brokerData.put("table1", List.of("broker1")); | ||
Set<String> tableSet = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokersSet(List.of("table1"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableSet, Set.of("broker1")); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersListOneTable() { | ||
_brokerData.put("table1", List.of("broker1")); | ||
List<String> tableList = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokers(List.of("table1"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertNotNull(tableList); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableList, List.of("broker1")); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersSetTwoTables() { | ||
_brokerData.put("table1", List.of("broker1")); | ||
_brokerData.put("table2", List.of("broker1")); | ||
Set<String> tableSet = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokersSet(List.of("table1", "table2"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertNotNull(tableSet); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableSet, Set.of("broker1")); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersListTwoTables() { | ||
_brokerData.put("table1", List.of("broker1")); | ||
_brokerData.put("table2", List.of("broker1")); | ||
List<String> tableList = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokers(List.of("table1", "table2"), _brokerData); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Wouldn't a single assert be more readable ? |
||
Assert.assertNotNull(tableList); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableList, List.of("broker1")); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersSetTwoTablesDifferentBrokers() { | ||
_brokerData.put("table1", List.of("broker1")); | ||
_brokerData.put("table2", List.of("broker2")); | ||
Set<String> tableSet = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokersSet(List.of("table1", "table2"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertEquals(tableSet, Set.of()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void getTablesCommonBrokersListTwoTablesDifferentBrokers() { | ||
_brokerData.put("table1", List.of("broker1")); | ||
_brokerData.put("table2", List.of("broker2")); | ||
List<String> tableList = BrokerSelectorUtils.getTablesCommonBrokers(List.of("table1", "table2"), _brokerData); | ||
Assert.assertNull(tableList); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@AfterMethod | ||
public void tearDown() { | ||
_brokerData.clear(); | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does the data type of the result (List vs Set) matter ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't depend on the returned data type. It is just that I'm keeping the older method for background compatibility reasons.
Implementation of the older method is not correct. Apart of being unnecessary expensive by allocating too much, the main issue is that depending on some conditions it either returns null or an empty set when there are not common brokers.
I'm just keeping the old method in case someone is using it outside this repo (I know we do), but the idea is to change or remove it in future.