Skip to content

Compare various VI frameworks in Python & discuss diagnostic tools and workflows for VI.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

annamenacher/Variational-Inference-Overview

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Variational-Inference-Overview

Discussed the following papers:

  • Blei, D. M., Kucukelbir, A., and McAuliffe, J. D. (2017). Variational inference: a review for statis- ticians. Journal of the American Statistical Associ- ation, 112:855–877.

  • Huggins, J. H., Kasprzak, M., Campbell, T., and Broderick, T. (2019). Practical posterior error bounds from variational objectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.04102.

  • Yao, Y., Vehtari, A., Simpson, D., and Gelman, A. (2018). Yes, but did it work?: Evaluating variational inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.02538.

  • Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., and Gabry, J. (2015). Pareto smoothed importance sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.02646.

... and many others.

Ended up comparing the various VI frameworks (Pyro, PyMC3, Theano, ...) as many were not flexible enough for different application problems.

About

Compare various VI frameworks in Python & discuss diagnostic tools and workflows for VI.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published