Fix importing KMP sources

[alexvanyo]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @alexvanyo, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses an issue with importing Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP) sources. It adds a temporary workaround by enabling the kotlin.kmp.isolated-projects.support flag in the gradle.properties file. This flag helps resolve dependency resolution failures in commonTest/nativeTest source sets when depending on another project.

Highlights

• KMP Source Import Fix: The pull request implements a workaround for a KMP source import issue.
• gradle.properties Update: The gradle.properties file is modified to enable kotlin.kmp.isolated-projects.support.
• Temporary Solution: The implemented fix is intended as a temporary solution until the underlying issue (KT-75605) is resolved in Kotlin.

Changelog

• gradle.properties
  • Added kotlin.kmp.isolated-projects.support=auto to address KMP source import issues.
  • Included a comment referencing the related YouTrack issue (KT-75605) for future removal of the workaround.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

A KMP fix,
A flag to assist,
Until the true fix,
Arrives to mix,
Then this workaround we dismiss.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

The pull request adds a temporary workaround for a known Kotlin Multiplatform (KMP) issue. The solution involves enabling isolated projects support. This is a reasonable approach given the circumstances. The added comment clearly explains the purpose and provides a link to the issue tracker. I have a suggestion to improve the comment, and to ensure the workaround is removed when the issue is resolved.

Summary of Findings

• Clarity of TODO comment: The TODO comment could be improved by specifying the exact version or event that triggers the removal of the workaround.

Merge Readiness

The pull request introduces a temporary workaround with a clear explanation and a link to the relevant issue. The change seems reasonable and necessary. I recommend addressing the comment suggestion to improve the clarity of the TODO. Given that this is a workaround, it's important to ensure it's removed once the underlying issue is resolved. I am unable to approve the pull request, and other reviewers should review and approve this code before merging.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.33%. Comparing base (3f904dc) to head (d28e851).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #2531   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     68.32%   68.33%           
  Complexity      563      563           
=========================================
  Files           260      260           
  Lines         13328    13328           
  Branches       1642     1642           
=========================================
+ Hits           9107     9108    +1     
  Misses         3571     3571           
+ Partials        650      649    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
21	68.32% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
35	68.29% <ø> (ø)
unit	68.33% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.