Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[doc] tutorial: use alchemlyb.concat #399

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

orbeckst
Copy link
Member

replace pandas.concat() with alchemlyb.concat() in the tutorial (given that we explicitly tell users to use it)

replace `pandas.concat()` with `alchemlyb.concat()` in the tutorial (given that we explicitly tell users to use it)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.78%. Comparing base (9ec63db) to head (9df0c6f).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #399   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.78%   98.78%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        1978     1978           
  Branches      435      435           
=======================================
  Hits         1954     1954           
  Misses          2        2           
  Partials       22       22           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@orbeckst orbeckst enabled auto-merge (squash) September 18, 2024 16:23
@orbeckst
Copy link
Member Author

@xiki-tempula we could add this fix with the 2.4.1 release #403

@orbeckst orbeckst merged commit ac29639 into master Sep 19, 2024
8 checks passed
@orbeckst orbeckst deleted the tutorial-use-alchemlyb-concat branch September 19, 2024 08:05
jaclark5 pushed a commit to jaclark5/alchemlyb that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
replace `pandas.concat()` with `alchemlyb.concat()` in the tutorial (given that we explicitly tell users to use it)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants