-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Website fix: Outdated config variable name #2409
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request focuses on standardizing the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/deploy-frontend-pr-previews.yml
(2 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-frontends-to-production.yml
(2 hunks).github/workflows/deploy-frontends-to-staging.yml
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/deploy-frontends-to-production.yml (1)
281-281
: LGTM! Value format is correct.The numeric format without the 's' suffix is the correct way to specify the cool-down period.
.github/workflows/deploy-frontends-to-staging.yml (1)
233-233
: LGTM! Value format is correct.The numeric format without the 's' suffix is the correct way to specify the cool-down period.
.github/workflows/deploy-frontend-pr-previews.yml (1)
656-656
: LGTM! Value format is correct.The numeric format without the 's' suffix is the correct way to specify the cool-down period.
Summary of Changes (What does this PR do?)
Summary by CodeRabbit
cool_down_period
tocool_down_period_sec
120s
to120
in deployment configurations