Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identify more training data sources #1

Closed
whoabuddy opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Identify more training data sources #1

whoabuddy opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor

We currently have:

  • stacksgov/sips repo
  • hirosystems/docs repo
  • stacks-network/docs repo
  • coinfabrik audits (2024)

What else should we add?

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

whoabuddy commented May 30, 2024

Add smart contracts repo from boom. (250gb?)

@moodmosaic has a curated version from fuzzing.

@moodmosaic
Copy link

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Linking this issue as the idea overlaps:

@whoabuddy whoabuddy changed the title Identify more data sources Identify more training data sources Jul 18, 2024
@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Style guides seem like something we want to document as well, AirBnB uses this one for example.

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Anthropic has a great course on using their LLMs here, content like this would be super helpful too:
https://github.com/anthropics/courses/tree/master

Might be worth breaking some of these out into smaller issues? What's the actionable next step(s)?

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Clarity book too!

@whoabuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Migrated items listed into this issue into separate issues as action items. Closing this one out!

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in AIBTCdev Progress Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants