-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
/
Copy path3_23_constant_computation.tex
208 lines (194 loc) · 9.98 KB
/
3_23_constant_computation.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
\begin{quote}\textit{
``I'm picking up good fibrations,\\
they're giving me computations.''
}\end{quote}
\label{const_comp}
In the next two sections, we'll use the formalism we developed and actually calculate things. There aren't many
examples of calculations in $\RO(G)$-graded cohomology, except for what people needed for other things: Stong has
some lecture notes which might be published, and the motivic homotopy theorists (specifically Dugger and Voevodsky)
used the $C_2$-equivariant category as a model for the motivic setting, and wrote up some calculations. See,
e.g.,~\cite{Lew88, Dug15}. Holler and Kriz~\cite{HollerKriz} compute the $\RO(C_2^n)$-graded cohomology
$H_{C_2^n}^*(*; \underline{\Z/2})$, and Zeng~\cite{Zeng17} computes the $\RO(C_{p^2})$-graded cohomology
$H^*(*;\underline\Z)$.\index{motivic homotopy theory}
The takeaway is that, even for groups such as $C_{p^n}$, calculating the Bredon cohomology of a point would almost
be a paper. People probably know what it is, but it would be interesting to understand. The equivariant Steenrod
and Dyer-Lashof algebras are also not understood well; Hill-Hopkins-Ravenel figured some of it out, but might not
have written all of it down. This would be hard to attack via a Cartan-style seminar, unfortunately.
Thus, it's not at all trivial that we're computing $H_{C_2}^*(*;\underline\Z)$. Recall that $\underline\Z$ comes
from the coefficient system
\[\xymatrix{
M(C_2/e)\ar@(ur,ul)_{}\\
M(C_2/C_2)\ar[u],
}\]
where both objects are $\Z$ and the restriction map is the identity, but as a Mackey functor, it also has a
transfer map $f_*$:\index{Mackey functor}
\[\xymatrix{
M(C_2/e)\ar@/_0.4cm/[d]_{f_*}\ar@(ur,ul)_\gamma\\
M(C_2/C_2).\ar@/_0.4cm/[u]_{f^*}
}\]
\begin{ex}
Show that the double coset formulae force $f_*f^* = 1+\gamma$ and $f^*f_* = 2$.\footnote{\TODO: I'd like to
double-check that I got this correct.}\index{double cosets}
\end{ex}
For $\underline\Z$,
\begin{itemize}
\item The coefficients are $M(C_2/C_2) = \Z$ and $M(C_2/e) = \Z$.
\item $f^* = \id$, $f_*$ is multiplication by $2$, and $\gamma = \id$.
\end{itemize}
\index{representation ring!of $C_2$}
As rings, $\RO(C_2)\cong\Z[\sigma]/(\sigma^2-1)$, where $\sigma$ denotes the sign representation.\index{sign
representation} Hence, every virtual representation\index{virtual representation} can be written $p+q\sigma$. Since
the additive structure is just $\Z^2$, we'll introduce a bigrading on $H^*_{C_2}(\bl)$, where $H_{C_2}^{p,q}(\bl)
\coloneqq H_{C_2}^{p+q\sigma}(\bl)$. The index $p$ is called the
\term[fixed dimension!of a $C_2$-representation]{fixed dimension}, and $q$ is called the
\term[sign representation!of a $C_2$-representation]{sign dimension}.
\begin{rem}
There's an alternative \term[motivic indexing!on $\RO(C_2)$]{motivic indexing} $H_{C_2}^{p+q,q}$, where $q$ counts
the number of copies of $\sigma$ and $p+q$ counts the total underlying dimension. We're not going to use this
grading.
\end{rem}
We're going to compute $\underline H_{C_2}^{*,*}(*;\underline\Z)$, i.e.\ as an $\RO(C_2)$-graded Mackey functor as
in \cref{MacFunCoh}. There are three steps:
\begin{enumerate}
\item\label{atC_2} First, compute the value at $C_2/C_2$, which is the abelian-group-valued cohomology
$H_{C_2}^{*,*}(C_2;\underline\Z)$.
\item\label{ate} Next, compute the value at $C_2/e$, which is the abelian-group-valued cohomology
$H_{C_2}^{*,*}(*;\underline\Z)$.
\item Finally, we must determine the restriction and transfer maps.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection*{Step~\ref{atC_2}.}
\begin{lem}
\[H_{C_2}^{p,q}(C_2; \underline\Z) = \begin{cases}
\Z, &p+q=0\\
0, &\text{\rm otherwise.}
\end{cases}\]
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
By adjunction, $H_{C_2}^{p,q}(C_2;\underline\Z)\cong H^{p+q}(*;\Z)$ (nonequivariant cohomology), because
$[C_{2+}\wedge X, Y]_{C_2}\cong [X,Y]$, and we know what the nonequivariant cohomology of a point is.
\end{proof}
\subsection*{Step~\ref{ate}.}
We'll compute $H_{C_2}^{*,*}(*;\underline\Z)$ by identifying it with Bredon homology or cohomology of spaces with
free $C_2$-actions, hence with the nonequivariant cohomology of the quotient. Let $q\sigma$ denote the direct sum
of $q$ copies of the sign representation, so that $S^{q\sigma}$ denotes its one-point
compactification.\index{representation sphere}
Let $q > 0$. Then,
\begin{align*}
H_{C_2}^{p,-q}(*) &\cong \wH_{C_2}^{p,-q}(S^0)\\
&\cong \wH_{C_2}^{p,0}(S^{q\sigma}).
\end{align*}
If $S(q\sigma)$ denotes the unit sphere inside $q\sigma$ and $D(q\sigma)$ denotes the unit disc, then there
is a cofiber sequence
\begin{equation}
\label{signed_cofiber}
\xymatrix{
S(q\sigma)\ar[r] & D(q\sigma)\ar[r] & S^{q\sigma}.
}
\end{equation}
\begin{ex}
Show that $D(q\sigma)$ is equivariantly contractible, and hence
\begin{align*}
\wH_{C_2}^{p,0}(S^{q\sigma}) &\cong\wH_{C_2}^{p,0}(\Sigma S(q\sigma))\\
&\cong\wH_{C_2}^{p-1,0}(S(q\sigma)).
\end{align*}
\end{ex}
The $C_2$-action on $S(q\sigma)$ is the antipodal action, hence free. Thus, the cohomology of $S(q\sigma)$ at a
trivial representation is the nonequivariant cohomology of the quotient:
\begin{align*}
\wH_{C_2}^{p-1,0}(S(q\sigma)) &\cong\wH^{p-1}(S(q\sigma)/C_2)\\
&\cong \wH^{p-1}(\RP^{q-1}) %\cong\begin{cases}
% \Z, &p = q, p\text{ even}\\
% \Z/2, &0 < p < q, p\text{ odd}
% \end{cases}
\end{align*}
\TODO: fill in the rest of the details.
For the other half of the plane, we use equivariant Spanier-Whitehead duality:\index{Spanier-Whitehead duality}
\[H_{C_2}^{p,q}(*)\cong \wH_{C_2}^{p,q}(S^0)\cong \wH_{-p,-q}^{C_2}(S^0)\cong \wH_{-p,0}(S^{\sigma q}).\]
Once again we'll apply $\wH_{*,0}$ to the cofiber sequence, and conclude when $k\ne 0,1$, $\wH_{k,0}(S^{\sigma
q})\cong \wH_{k-1,0}(S(\sigma q))$, which will again relate to projective spaces; for $k = 0,1$, we'll have to open
up the long exact sequence.
Inducting over the cofiber sequence is a common trick, and is a good one to carry with you.
Let's recall some Mackey functors from \cref{Mackeyexm}. We'll write them out carefully so as to not make a
mistake. The constant Mackey functor $\underline\Z$ is\index{constant Mackey functor}
\[\xymatrix{
\Z\ar@/_0.4cm/[d]_2\ar@(ur,ul)_\id\\
\Z,\ar@/_0.4cm/[u]_\id
}\]
where the top entry corresponds to the orbit $C_2/e$, and the bottom to the orbit $C_2/C_2$. There's another Mackey
functor, denoted $\underline\Z\rop$, given by switching the restriction and transfer:\index{opposite Mackey
functor}
\[\xymatrix{
\Z\ar@/_0.4cm/[d]_\id\ar@(ur,ul)_\id\\
\Z.\ar@/_0.4cm/[u]_2
}\]
If $\pi\colon C_2\times X\to X$ is projection onto the second factor and $M$ is a Mackey functor, we get maps going
both ways:
\[\xymatrix{
H_{C_2}^{p,q}(X;M)\ar@<0.1cm>[r]^-{\pi^*} & H_{C_2}^{p,q}(C_2\times X; M).\ar@<0.1cm>[l]^-{\pi_!}
}\]
Finally, it'll be good to remember a fact about the dimension axiom: the transfers in a Mackey functor $M$ coincide
with the transfer maps in cohomology induced by maps between orbits.
% Anyways, we were computing $H_{C_2}^{p,q}(*)$, where $p$ is the \term{fixed dimension} and $q$ is the \term{sign
% dimension}, i.e.\ indexed by the $C_2$-representation $V \coloneqq \R^p\oplus\sigma^q$, where $\R$ is the trivial
% representation and $\sigma$ is the sign representation. First, we computed that
% \[H_{C_2}^{p,q}(C_2)\cong H^{p+q}(\pt) = \begin{cases}
% \Z, &p+q = 0\\
% 0, &\text{otherwise.}
% \end{cases}\]
% If $q > 0$, then we computed
% \[H^{-p.-q}_{C_2}(*) \cong \wH_{C_2}^{p,0}(S^{\sigma q})\cong\wH^p(\Sigma\RP^{q-1}),\]
% because the Eilenberg-Steenrod axioms meant that for a free action, we can compute the nonequivariant cohomology of
% the quotient.
\TODO: streamline this, and explicitly state the final answer.
To compute $H_{C_2}^{p,q}(*)$, we use duality:
\[H_{C_2}^{p,q}(*) \cong \wH^{p,q}_{C_2}(S^0)\cong \wH_{-p,-q}(S^0)\cong \wH_{-p,0}(S^{\sigma q}),\]
and that's where we left off. To continue, we'll use the cofiber sequence~\eqref{signed_cofiber}, as well as its
based version
\begin{equation}
\label{based_signed}
\xymatrix{
S(\sigma q)_+\ar[r] & D(\sigma q)_+\ar[r] & S^{\sigma q},
}
\end{equation}
and it's worth noting that the middle space is equivalent to $S^0$, which is sometimes implicit in the literature.
If $k\ne 0,1$, apply $\wH_{k,0}$ to~\eqref{signed_cofiber} to conclude that
\[\wH_{k,0}(S^{q\sigma})\cong \wH_{k-1}(S(\sigma q))\]
and therefore that
\[\wH_{C_2}^{p,q}(*)\cong \wH_{-p-1}(\RP^{q-1}).\]
Recall that the cohomology of $\RP^m$ is
\[H^i(\RP^m) = \begin{cases}
\Z, &i = 0\\
\Z, &i = m\text{ and $m$ is odd}\\
\Z/2, &0 < i < m\text{ and $i$ is odd}\\
0, &\text{otherwise,}
\end{cases}\]
so we get a bunch of copies of $\Z$ and $\Z/2$.
That leaves $k = 0,1$, for which we must look at the long exact sequence
\[\xymatrix{
0\ar[r] & \wH_{1,0}(S^{q\sigma})\ar[r] & \wH_{0,0}(S(q\sigma))\ar[r]^-\gamma &\Z\ar[r] &
\wH_{0,0}(S^{q\sigma})\ar[r] & 0.
}\]
\begin{claim}
$\gamma$ is multiplication by $2$, and therefore $\wH_{1,0}(S^{q\sigma})\cong 0$ and
$\wH_{0,0}(S^{q\sigma})\cong\Z/2$.
\end{claim}
\begin{proof}
The idea is to identify the map $\gamma$ as the transfer map\index{transfer map} for the Mackey functor
$\underline\Z$. Said another way, we want to see $\gamma$ as coming from the map $H_{0,0}(C_2)\to H_{0,0}(\pt)$
associated to the map $C_2\to *$. This follows from the dimension axiom and the fact that $S(\sigma)\cong C_2$.
\end{proof}
So now, how do we express this in terms of Mackey functors? This is only nontrivial in the $C_2$ orbit and when the
cohomology is nonzero (the zero Mackey functor is not hard to define). Thus, we care about the case $p+q = 0$.
Consider the long exact sequence
\[\xymatrix{
H_{C_2}^{-(2n-1), 2n-1}(*) & H_{C_2}^{-2n,2n}(C_2)\ar[l]\\
& H_{C_2}^{-2n,2n}(C_2)\ar[u]_\zeta & H_{C_2}^{-2n,2n-1}(*),\ar[l]
}\]
which comes from~\eqref{signed_cofiber} when $q = 1$, i.e.\ the cofiber sequence $C_2\to S^0\to S^\sigma$. The map
$\zeta$ is the transfer in the Mackey functor.
\begin{ex}
Show, using the double coset formula, that when $n > 0$, $\zeta$ is an isomorphism, and when $n < 0$, it's
multiplication by $2$.\index{double cosets}
\end{ex}
That is, when $n > 0$, the cohomology, as a Mackey functor, is $\underline\Z$, and when $n < 0$, it's
$\underline\Z\rop$.