Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update bandit.yml with version bump #2497

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

reactive-firewall
Copy link

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall commented Sep 10, 2024

Migrate to latest, maintained, version of bandit code-scanning action.

Noteworthy changes:

  • Maintained action is a fork of the unmaintained previous version. - Versions are still pinnable ( including bug-for-bug compatible v1.0 ) - Maintained project now utilizes @dependabot to keep sub-dependencies current.
  • Maintained action is already released on marketplace.
  • Credits updated with both original and maintainer with no change to licensing.
  • Updated to use checkout@v4 now.

📋 TL;DR - PR Template with checklist from code owners

Please note that at this time we are only accepting new starter workflows for Code Scanning. Updates to existing starter workflows are fine.


Tasks

For all workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be contained in a .yml file with the language or platform as its filename, in lower, kebab-cased format (for example, docker-image.yml). Special characters should be removed or replaced with words as appropriate (for example, "dotnet" instead of ".NET").
  • Should use sentence case for the names of workflows and steps (for example, "Run tests").
  • Should be named only by the name of the language or platform (for example, "Go", not "Go CI" or "Go Build").
  • Should include comments in the workflow for any parts that are not obvious or could use clarification.
  • Should specify least privileged permissions for GITHUB_TOKEN so that the workflow runs successfully.

For Code Scanning workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be preserved under the code-scanning directory.
  • Should include a matching code-scanning/properties/*.properties.json file (for example, code-scanning/properties/codeql.properties.json), with properties set as follows:
    • name: Name of the Code Scanning integration.
    • creator: Name of the organization/user producing the Code Scanning integration.
      PLEASE ADVISE does this need to be changed?
    • description: Short description of the Code Scanning integration.
    • categories: Array of languages supported by the Code Scanning integration.
    • iconName: Name of the SVG logo representing the Code Scanning integration. This SVG logo must be present in the icons directory.
  • Should run on push to branches: [ $default-branch, $protected-branches ] and pull_request to branches: [ $default-branch ]. We also recommend a schedule trigger of cron: $cron-weekly (for example, codeql.yml).

Some general notes:

  • This workflow must only use actions that are produced by GitHub, in the actions organization, or
  • This workflow must only use actions that are produced by the language or ecosystem that the workflow supports. These actions must be published to the GitHub Marketplace. We require that these actions be referenced using the full 40 character hash of the action's commit instead of a tag. Additionally, workflows must include the following comment at the top of the workflow file:
    # This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub.
    # They are provided by a third-party and are governed by
    # separate terms of service, privacy policy, and support
    # documentation.
    
  • Automation and CI workflows should not send data to any 3rd party service except for the purposes of installing dependencies.
  • Automation and CI workflows cannot be dependent on a paid service or product.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the code-scanning Related to workflows that show on the Code Scanning setup page label Sep 10, 2024
reactive-firewall

This comment was marked as resolved.

@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2024 23:05
@reactive-firewall reactive-firewall requested review from a team as code owners September 10, 2024 23:05
@reactive-firewall
Copy link
Author

reactive-firewall commented Sep 11, 2024

Tagging possible community stakeholders ( i.e. Request for Comment )

TL;DR:

Regarding which version to pin for actions/checkout (i.e. leave as actions/checkout@v4 versus change to actions/checkout@4.2.2

Regarding Included fixes from overlapping, related, or similar work (i.e. relevant community):

Regarding Possible Overlap with other PRs in this repo:

code-scanning/bandit.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
reactive-firewall

This comment was marked as resolved.

reactive-firewall

This comment was marked as outdated.

reactive-firewall added a commit to reactive-firewall/python-bandit-scan that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2024
…ity features

> [!NOTE]
> 
> Due to the backup, upstream with
[actions/starter-workflows#2497](actions/starter-workflows#2497)
not yet resolved, this PR will include at-least two minor version bumps:
> 
> *
[v2.2](637c5c4)
@
[637c5c4](637c5c4)
> *
[v2.3](f8cf05e)
@
[f8cf05e](f8cf05e)

---
reactive-firewall and others added 3 commits December 13, 2024 22:20
Migrate to latest, maintained, version of action.
 * Maintained action is a fork of the unmaintained previous version.
    - Versions are still pinnable ( including bug-for-bug compatible `v1.0` )
    - Maintained project now utilizes @dependabot to keep sub-dependencies current.
    - Maintained action is already released on marketplace
 * Credits both original and maintainer with no change to licensing
 * Updated to use checkout@v4 already
Two minor changes here:
* removed unnecessary whitespace
* pined by SHA latest version of python-bandit-scan (v2.1) reactive-firewall@python-bandit-scan@c8b1d56a3964de4e00e7a820dddb38661a4b7566
- removes an un-intended space from the config to fix the syntax. 🙈

Co-authored-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
@reactive-firewall
Copy link
Author

Another rebase to keep this current with main.

💁🏻 LGTM! No conflicts from rebasing (from actions:main to remain current).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code-scanning Related to workflows that show on the Code Scanning setup page
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants