Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

peer review: <Mitchell Weingust Team 22> Verification and Validation Team Breakdown is Too General #146

Open
Tracked by #151
mitcholll opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
review To be used with different parties for review purposes

Comments

@mitcholll
Copy link

artifact under review.

VnV Plan Document

team number (for the team doing the review).

Team 22

description of issue.

Section 3.1 Verification and Validation Team is a bit too general, and leaves out crucial details when it comes to verifying and validating your system. For example, there is no mention of regular reviews by your supervisor or TA. As well, having the general statement of "Automated Testing" as a role could overlap with other team members roles, such as in "Software Validation" and "SRS Validation", as all 3 will touch the system's software.

It would be beneficial for the team to identify their core strengths and interests when it comes to testing. Perhaps you can organize your responsibilities by areas of testing/features instead of only by the documents. Multiple people can be assigned to a document too, as testing the entire SRS may be quite challenging and time consuming for one person!

@CSchank

@mitcholll mitcholll added the review To be used with different parties for review purposes label Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
review To be used with different parties for review purposes
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant