Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scatter correlations #258

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 1, 2024
Merged

Scatter correlations #258

merged 6 commits into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

d-callan
Copy link
Contributor

in support of bpnet 2.0 scatter plots

@@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ test_that("scattergl.dt() returns an appropriately sized data.table", {

dt <- scattergl.dt(df, variables, 'raw')
expect_equal(nrow(dt), 9)
expect_equal(names(dt), c('entity.cat3', 'entity.factor3','seriesX','seriesY'))
expect_equal(names(dt), c('entity.factor3', 'entity.cat3','seriesX','seriesY', 'correlationCoef', 'pValue'))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there have been a few name swaps like this one for factor3 and cat3. Did we just have lots of tests failing for a while?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

idk tbh

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i suspect i need to revisit github actions testing for veupathUtils and plot.data though. i feel like i def saw a veupathUtils github actions test pass the other day that i knew should fail...

@d-callan d-callan merged commit b71a74d into main May 1, 2024
5 checks passed
@d-callan d-callan deleted the scatter-correlations branch May 1, 2024 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants