You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue tracks the fact that, for some properties (often existential), the timed-traces semantic model is overly restrictive. It requires time to be considered as part of the trace, which then means that cold occurrences without duration bounds permit a set of traces parameterised by every possible number of tocks before the occurrence; situations where the model performs actions urgently require a large amount of duration(0) applying.
Could we just hide tock on both ends? Or would we need to use the untimed semantic model of RoboChart?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue tracks the fact that, for some properties (often existential), the timed-traces semantic model is overly restrictive. It requires time to be considered as part of the trace, which then means that cold occurrences without duration bounds permit a set of traces parameterised by every possible number of tocks before the occurrence; situations where the model performs actions urgently require a large amount of
duration(0)
applying.Could we just hide
tock
on both ends? Or would we need to use the untimed semantic model of RoboChart?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: