Refactor Ets BinOp enum classes

[zishkaz]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Lifecycle test results

78 tests  ±0   78 ✅ ±0   1m 53s ⏱️ -2s
 7 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 7 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit feb378a. ± Comparison against base commit 133474f.

[github-actions]

Test results on JDK 19

   83 files  ±0     83 suites  ±0   25m 50s ⏱️ +18s
2 511 tests ±0  2 469 ✅ ±0  42 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
2 539 runs  ±0  2 497 ✅ ±0  42 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit feb378a. ± Comparison against base commit 133474f.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.68085% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 60.01%. Comparing base (133474f) to head (feb378a).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...odb-ets/src/main/kotlin/org/jacodb/ets/base/Ops.kt	43.18%	24 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...-ets/src/main/kotlin/org/jacodb/ets/dto/Convert.kt	50.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                neo     #248      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     60.03%   60.01%   -0.03%     
- Complexity     2244     2247       +3     
============================================
  Files           310      310              
  Lines         18122    18115       -7     
  Branches       3259     3261       +2     
============================================
- Hits          10880    10872       -8     
- Misses         6164     6166       +2     
+ Partials       1078     1077       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Test results on JDK 11

   83 files  ±0     83 suites  ±0   29m 57s ⏱️ - 1m 43s
2 511 tests ±0  2 471 ✅ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
2 539 runs  ±0  2 499 ✅ ±0  40 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit feb378a. ± Comparison against base commit 133474f.

[github-actions]

Test results on JDK 8

   83 files  ±0     83 suites  ±0   31m 8s ⏱️ - 1m 15s
2 511 tests ±0  2 466 ✅ ±0  45 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
2 539 runs  ±0  2 494 ✅ ±0  45 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit feb378a. ± Comparison against base commit 133474f.

[Lipen]

@zishkaz Thanks for your effort! Your changes are now superseded by #249. Please, review it and compare the usability.