You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I did not pay attention to the version of clang I was using on OSX and removed the -Og flag. The -Og flag is actually supported since version 4.0: http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#id5
The next important feature, which should be enabled if available is modules (see also #70).
An outdated clang might also be the reason for some of the issues I had with sanitization flags (e.g. #39).
Therefore, it would be great to know if certain flags are supported by the available version of clang.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With PR #118 we can reliably and quickly detect the C++ language versions.
Regarding the LLVM/Clang versions, maybe for now we should just always assume that it is always reasonably new?
I did not pay attention to the version of clang I was using on OSX and removed the
-Og
flag. The-Og
flag is actually supported since version 4.0: http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#id5The next important feature, which should be enabled if available is modules (see also #70).
An outdated clang might also be the reason for some of the issues I had with sanitization flags (e.g. #39).
Therefore, it would be great to know if certain flags are supported by the available version of clang.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: