-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PREEMPT_RT latency performance for SDK 10.1 #137
Conversation
New warnings found with rstcheck:
|
Address this warning |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Content is fine. Just style issues.
source/devices/AM62AX/linux/img/rt-cpu-method-all-latency-histogram.png
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
source/devices/AM62PX/linux/img/rt-cpu-method-all-latency-histogram.png
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
source/devices/AM62X/linux/img/rt-cpu-method-all-latency-histogram.png
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/rt-cpu-method-all-latency-histogram.png
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
7d6cb38
to
f3235fb
Compare
New warnings found with rstcheck:
|
Update the AM62Ax latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Update the AM62Px latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Headers named after the SoC platform inside SoC specific documentation is redundant. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Update the AM64x latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
Update the AM62x latency numbers for the SDK 10.1 release Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb@ti.com>
f3235fb
to
df902aa
Compare
PR is updated
@StaticRocket / @DhruvaG2000 / @AashvijShenai for final review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As much as I'd like to standardize asset locations, we have enough measures in place to prevent issues with people putting images and files near their RST source files. This is fine.
Hello Everyone!
This small series updates the PREEMPT_RT latency performance numbers for the CoreSDK 10.1 release observed when using a simple CPU based background load.
Happy Hacking
~Bryan