Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(devices): Update build information for AM62x & AM62P #108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

feat(devices): Update build information for AM62x & AM62P #108

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

cshilwant
Copy link
Member

@cshilwant cshilwant commented Dec 12, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • For SDK 10.1, update commit SHA & Release tag of meta-edegai
    layer in AM62x family & AM62P which is used for ARM only Analytics 1

  • Fix indentation of important directive based on CONTRIBUTING guidelines 2

@cshilwant cshilwant requested a review from a team December 12, 2024 11:44
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

New warnings found with rstcheck:

WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM57X/rtos/Release_Specific_Supported_Platforms_and_Versions.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM62PX/debian/index.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM62AX/linux/Release_Specific_Migration_Guide.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM62PX/android/index.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM62X/debian/index.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM62PX/linux/Release_Specific_Migration_Guide.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM64X/debian/index.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Overview_Software_Stack.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Examples_and_Demos_Matrix_User_Guide.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Overview_Building_the_SDK.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/index.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/devices/AM64X/linux/Release_Specific_Migration_Guide.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Industrial_Protocols_OPCUA.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components_CMEM.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components_IPC.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/debian/Building_Debian_Packages.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/debian/Building_Debian_Image.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Industrial_Protocols_ICSS_Dual_EMAC.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components_IPC62ax.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/debian/How_to_Guides/index_How_to_Guides.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/android/Overview.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components_IPC_J722S.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components_IPC_J784S4.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components_Boot_Monitor.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/How_to_Guides/Hardware_Setup_with_CCS/J721E_EVM_Hardware_Setup.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/How_to_Guides/Hardware_Setup_with_CCS/J722S_EVM_Hardware_Setup.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/How_to_Guides/Host/K3_Resource_Partitioning_Tool.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components/_Boot_Monitor.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.
WARNING:rstcheck_core.checker:An `AttributeError` error occured. This is most probably due to a code block directive (code/code-block/sourcecode) without a specified language. This may result in a false negative for source: 'source/linux/Foundational_Components/Graphics/Common/PVR_Tools.rst'. The reason can also be another directive. For more information see the FAQ (https://rstcheck-core.rtfd.io/en/latest/faq) or the corresponding github issue: https://github.com/rstcheck/rstcheck-core/issues/3.

jeevantelukula
jeevantelukula previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
jsuhaas22
jsuhaas22 previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
@praneethbajjuri
Copy link
Collaborator

@ravi-rahul this doesnt look like the right tag. Can you please confirm what is the correct tag to be used for 10.1 release
https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/tag/?h=10.01.00.06 is this right one ?

@ravi-rahul
Copy link
Contributor

@ravi-rahul this doesnt look like the right tag. Can you please confirm what is the correct tag to be used for 10.1 release https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/tag/?h=10.01.00.06 is this right one ?

No, we are using 10.01.00.05 for AM62A, 10.01.00.06 has a fix for J784S4 not relevant for AM62A
@sinha-shreyash Can you please update the PR

@cshilwant
Copy link
Member Author

@praneethbajjuri @ravi-rahul This is for ARM only analytics for AM62x & AM62P and the PR is from me.

AM62A still uses 10.01.00.05. Link to Shreyas PR - #101

@cshilwant
Copy link
Member Author

@ravi-rahul For AM62x, AM62P (ARM only stack) is it alright if we pick https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/commit/?h=scarthgap&id=4cba875d5173dee6b4ca34bd41d5a8b47891e0c7 for final builds

OR

Are there any changes w.r.t. AM62x, AM62P for which we should pick https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/tag/?h=10.01.00.05 ?

@ravi-rahul
Copy link
Contributor

@ravi-rahul For AM62x, AM62P (ARM only stack) is it alright if we pick https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/commit/?h=scarthgap&id=4cba875d5173dee6b4ca34bd41d5a8b47891e0c7 for final builds

OR

Are there any changes w.r.t. AM62x, AM62P for which we should pick https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/tag/?h=10.01.00.05 ?

Hi @cshilwant

No changes wrt ARM only stack
You are good

@praneethbajjuri
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok, if there is no changes or no impact irrespective of what is taken, pick a named tag is the preference.

StaticRocket
StaticRocket previously requested changes Dec 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@StaticRocket StaticRocket left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#108 (comment)

@cshilwant cshilwant force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 8bb5b2b to bf6dd30 Compare December 12, 2024 17:19
@cshilwant cshilwant dismissed StaticRocket’s stale review December 12, 2024 17:20

Author updated the PR

@cshilwant
Copy link
Member Author

@StaticRocket Updated the PR

@cshilwant @praneethbajjuri
feat(devices): Update build information for AM62x & AM62P
254f24e 
- For SDK 10.1, update commit SHA & Release tag of meta-edegai
layer in AM62x family & AM62P which is used for ARM only Analytics [1]

- Fix indentation of important directive based on CONTRIBUTING guidelines [2]

[1]: https://git.ti.com/cgit/edgeai/meta-edgeai/tag/?h=10.01.10.04

[2]: https://github.com/TexasInstruments/processor-sdk-doc/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#indentation-and-whitespace

Signed-off-by: Chirag Shilwant <c-shilwant@ti.com>
@cshilwant cshilwant requested a review from a team December 12, 2024 19:24
@cshilwant cshilwant merged commit 0ad5542 into TexasInstruments:master Dec 12, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@praneethbajjuri praneethbajjuri praneethbajjuri approved these changes

@StaticRocket StaticRocket StaticRocket approved these changes

@AashvijShenai AashvijShenai AashvijShenai approved these changes

@uditkumarti uditkumarti Awaiting requested review from uditkumarti uditkumarti is a code owner

@aniket-l aniket-l Awaiting requested review from aniket-l aniket-l is a code owner

@DhruvaG2000 DhruvaG2000 Awaiting requested review from DhruvaG2000

@jeevantelukula jeevantelukula Awaiting requested review from jeevantelukula

@jsuhaas22 jsuhaas22 Awaiting requested review from jsuhaas22

@paresh-bhagat12 paresh-bhagat12 Awaiting requested review from paresh-bhagat12

Assignees

@DhruvaG2000 DhruvaG2000

@AashvijShenai AashvijShenai

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@cshilwant @praneethbajjuri @ravi-rahul @StaticRocket @AashvijShenai @jsuhaas22 @paresh-bhagat12 @jeevantelukula @DhruvaG2000