Skip to content

proxy skeleton with lib #143

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025
Merged

proxy skeleton with lib #143

merged 9 commits into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

ailchuk
Copy link

@ailchuk ailchuk commented Mar 17, 2025

  • lib for common resources
  • proxy initial implementation
  • proper redis cache rework
  • small fix to make simulator more stable

@ailchuk ailchuk requested a review from Cahb March 17, 2025 10:16
@ailchuk ailchuk force-pushed the dev-proxy-skeleton-with-lib branch 3 times, most recently from 15b8e13 to eb8dd3c Compare March 20, 2025 19:51
@ailchuk ailchuk force-pushed the dev-proxy-skeleton-with-lib branch 2 times, most recently from 55c2916 to f6e354f Compare March 28, 2025 09:26
@ailchuk ailchuk force-pushed the dev-proxy-skeleton-with-lib branch 4 times, most recently from 05074f6 to abb177d Compare April 8, 2025 10:42
Cahb added 2 commits April 8, 2025 16:02
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>
Tests can fail if run in multi cgw env.
The reason is that <metrics> are a bit more delayed
compare to the <redis> assigned num / counters.

Do a mini sleep on each check when necessary.
Some tests (like stress test - max num of groups assign)
can still fail. Fix / W/A - TODO.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Mazur <oleksandr.mazur@plvision.eu>
@ailchuk ailchuk force-pushed the dev-proxy-skeleton-with-lib branch from abb177d to 8ec629c Compare April 9, 2025 10:14
@ailchuk ailchuk force-pushed the dev-proxy-skeleton-with-lib branch from 8ec629c to 1950817 Compare April 9, 2025 10:15
@ailchuk ailchuk force-pushed the dev-proxy-skeleton-with-lib branch from 1950817 to d832532 Compare April 9, 2025 13:58
@Cahb Cahb merged commit 047f211 into next Apr 11, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants