From bc7b04a2e15fa9a045785a12cbbf7280282c9ad8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yassin Kammoun
 <52890329+yassin-kammoun-sonarsource@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:40:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Modify rule S1126: Use the terms 'truthy' and 'falsy' (#3548)

---
 rules/S1126/javascript/rule.adoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/rules/S1126/javascript/rule.adoc b/rules/S1126/javascript/rule.adoc
index 19c72317dca..805627121e7 100644
--- a/rules/S1126/javascript/rule.adoc
+++ b/rules/S1126/javascript/rule.adoc
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 == Why is this an issue?
 
-The ``++if...else++`` statement is used to make decisions based on the truthiness of a boolean expression, and the ``++if++`` block executes when the expression is ``++true++``, while the ``++else++`` block executes when the expression is false.
+The ``++if...else++`` statement is used to make decisions based on the truthiness of a boolean expression, and the ``++if++`` block executes when the expression is truthy, while the ``++else++`` block executes when the expression is falsy.
 
 Wrapping a boolean expression in an ``++if...else++`` statement and returning ``++true++`` or ``++false++`` in the respective blocks is redundant and unnecessary. It can also make the code harder to maintain, as it adds unnecessary lines of code that need to be read and understood.