Skip to content

问几个问题,关于gae有效性、软件信任自签证书 #153

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote
  • 您仓库中gae服务端那一分支是两年前更新的,那么这个工具配合gae方案目前是不可用的吗?

  • gae服务端代码有没有更新的打算?

我已多次在不同位置声明过不再维护,现有服务端也无法直接使用,本地客户端相关代码仍然保持正常提供功能,如果服务端没人跟进,一段时间后就会移除它们。

1. 对于直接连接的google服务,gotox为什么也要求用户信任自签证书?

这个没有限死,可以修改自动规则使用转发连接。这么做,部分被屏蔽的 SNI 会导致你的网络被自动限制 (影响不定视运气),除非只使用 ESNI,但是这样还需要走 GotoX?直接直连不好吗。然后,不同域名连接也无法相互复用,需要非常多的 IP 才能正常连接,然而并没有那么多 IP 给你使用。而且因为丢包率高,容易出现卡连接的现象。

2. Cloudflare Worker也在代理字段中带类似appid的信息吗?

是的,你可以看它的文档,或者抓包查看。

3. Cloudflare Worker作代理应该仅需要用户信任Cloudflare的证书(按照我理解cloudflare文档,不一定对),似乎gotox也要求信任自签证书

如果你的需求仅只是浏览,那么 CFWorkers 使用几行简单代码就能反代,结果就是除了浏览你什么都没法做,而且还只能一对一反代,稍微复杂些的可以一对多。你可以看看其它使用 CFWorkers 的非网页代理 (暂时我只看到一个),同样需要有自签证书。

关于自签证书,采用的是 2048 位密钥,近期内无需担心安全性。前提是本地密钥要保管好,我在证书部分有说明。而且你也不会用 Go…

Replies: 17 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by SeaHOH
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #153 on December 16, 2020 06:26.