You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I met with the Mobility Disability Resource Center in person today. Very good meeting with Dr Johannes Christian and an actual wheelchair user. Their recommendation was to map the Near East area first. On the West Side they recommended Franklinton and HillTop. Basically starting from the inner city areas first and moving out along the corridors. And increasing the area from the corridors was important to them. For example for Near East area we might plot the area from 670 on the north to 70 on the south and from 71 on the west to Nelson Road on the East. Just a suggestion, but I feel a lot better acting on suggestions from a group that actual wants to partner with us. Also I am forwarding Nick's email about the need to break up the Corridor areas @dallemang originally proposed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
During last week's OpenColumbus project meetup @dallemang created the next set of regions for future OpenSidewalk projects in Columbus. The Olde Town East region is the highest priority.
I met with the Mobility Disability Resource Center in person today. Very good meeting with Dr Johannes Christian and an actual wheelchair user. Their recommendation was to map the Near East area first. On the West Side they recommended Franklinton and HillTop. Basically starting from the inner city areas first and moving out along the corridors. And increasing the area from the corridors was important to them. For example for Near East area we might plot the area from 670 on the north to 70 on the south and from 71 on the west to Nelson Road on the East. Just a suggestion, but I feel a lot better acting on suggestions from a group that actual wants to partner with us. Also I am forwarding Nick's email about the need to break up the Corridor areas @dallemang originally proposed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: