Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating sbom licensing to Community Specification License 1.0 #2

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 8, 2023

Conversation

idunbarh
Copy link

See issue SBOMit/specification#13.

LF started IP/License review of SBOMit for the OpenSSF sandbox application, and ossf#191 (comment)

See https://github.com/CommunitySpecification/Community_Specification/blob/main/1._Community_Specification_License-v1.md
This is required by the OpenSSF Charter (Section 5, Page 9):
https://cdn.platform.linuxfoundation.org/agreements/openssf.pdf

…s Community Specification License 1.0 as requested by LF IP/license review.

Signed-off-by: Ian Dunbar-Hall <ian.dunbar-hall@lmco.com>
@colek42
Copy link
Member

colek42 commented Aug 25, 2023

LGTM

@idunbarh idunbarh marked this pull request as draft August 26, 2023 15:43
@idunbarh
Copy link
Author

Switching to draft to ensure its not merged until licensing until discussion with LF and maintainers is resolved.

@idunbarh idunbarh marked this pull request as ready for review September 7, 2023 03:02
@idunbarh
Copy link
Author

idunbarh commented Sep 7, 2023

@JustinCappos thoughts on this PR? We have support from @mnm678 @colek42 and @trishankatdatadog.

@JustinCappos
Copy link
Collaborator

I'm asking Mike Dolan the process for changing the license, both now and if we need to change it again later. In general, I'm supportive.

Signed-off-by: Ian Dunbar-Hall <ian.dunbar-hall@lmco.com>
@idunbarh idunbarh merged commit 1ae9515 into SBOMit:main Sep 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants