Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong copy-paste from another help page #74

Closed
freest5 opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Wrong copy-paste from another help page #74

freest5 opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution type/incorrect-statement Statements in the documentation are incorrect. ua-review Under review by the UA team.

Comments

@freest5
Copy link

freest5 commented Jun 10, 2024

Issue description

On the page"Decoupling via Data Store" there is a text which is not relevant for this case:
"Because the retry is performed within the same instance of the message processing log, the message processing log ID and, as a result, the mapped unique ID remain the same."

Seems it is copy-paste from referenced "Decoupling via JMS Queue" page.

In the current Data Store case, MPL ID is not used as the unique ID, but the Data Store entry ID is used which is updated from ${property.orderNumber}, which in its turn is retrieved from the payload.

Feedback Type (Optional)

incorrect statement

Page Title on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

Decoupling via Data Store

Page URL on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

https://help.sap.com/docs/cloud-integration/sap-cloud-integration/decoupling-via-data-store

@SrutiSagaram SrutiSagaram added the ua-review Under review by the UA team. label Jun 11, 2024
@SrutiSagaram
Copy link

Hi @freest5
Thank you for your feedback. We will take a look and get back.

@pe-gu pe-gu added contribution Valuable Contribution type/incorrect-statement Statements in the documentation are incorrect. labels Jun 12, 2024
@pe-gu pe-gu closed this as completed Jun 12, 2024
@pe-gu
Copy link
Contributor

pe-gu commented Jun 12, 2024

Hello @freest5, thank you for your finding! I have corrected the mistake.

@freest5
Copy link
Author

freest5 commented Jun 12, 2024

@pe-gu Thank you a lot, Peter! Best wishes, Stan.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution type/incorrect-statement Statements in the documentation are incorrect. ua-review Under review by the UA team.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants