Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Access Policies are missing from the Guidelines for non-transportable Content #69

Closed
sebastianesch opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Access Policies are missing from the Guidelines for non-transportable Content #69

sebastianesch opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
@pe-gu
Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation. ua-review Under review by the UA team.

Comments

@sebastianesch
Copy link

Issue description

As per SAP Note 3265467 Access Policies can't be transported at the moment. The Guide for Handling Integration Artifacts that cannot be transported does not cover Access Policies.

Feedback Type (Optional)

content gaps

Page Title on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

Handling Integration Artifacts When Reusing an Integration Flow on Multiple Tenants

Page URL on SAP Help Portal (prefilled)

https://help.sap.com/docs/cloud-integration/sap-cloud-integration/handling-integration-artifacts-when-reusing-integration-flow-on-multiple-tenants
@SrutiSagaram SrutiSagaram added the ua-review Under review by the UA team. label Jun 4, 2024
@SrutiSagaram
Copy link

Hi @sebastianesch

Thank you for your feedback, we will look into it and get back.

@pe-gu pe-gu added the contribution Valuable Contribution label Jun 4, 2024
@SrutiSagaram SrutiSagaram added the type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation. label Jun 4, 2024
@pe-gu
Copy link
Contributor

pe-gu commented Jun 5, 2024

Dear @sebastianesch, many thanks for your feedback! I have updated the topic. Best regards, Peter

@pe-gu pe-gu closed this as completed Jun 5, 2024
@pe-gu
Copy link
Contributor

pe-gu commented Jun 5, 2024

Dear @sebastianesch, many thanks for your feedback! I have updated the topic. Best regards, Peter

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pe-gu pe-gu

Labels
contribution Valuable Contribution type/content-gaps Something essential is missing in the documentation. ua-review Under review by the UA team.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@sebastianesch @SrutiSagaram @pe-gu