Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Result times with 1/10s precision #927

Open
xkenia opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 19 comments
Open

Result times with 1/10s precision #927

xkenia opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 19 comments
Assignees

Comments

@xkenia
Copy link
Collaborator

xkenia commented Jun 22, 2023

Zdar, nezkousel nekdo mereni casu na 1/10s? Na World Cup 2023 to bude potreba.

Co jsem se dival, tak v db mame casy v milisekundach, ale nevim, jak je to potom nasledne s vypoctem celkoveho casu.

@otahirs
Copy link
Member

otahirs commented Jun 22, 2023

V db je to v milisekundach, ale nejsem si jisty jestli i pri vycteni neni treba specialni logika navic. Matne si vybavaju jestli byty pro subsecond cas nejsou jeste jinde a ted se ignoruji.

@paukert
Copy link
Member

paukert commented Jun 22, 2023

Pokud se něco nezměnilo, tak QE na to ready asi ještě není - #728

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

Zkousel jsem ted SPORTident Config+
Vycist cipy pouzite v nejakem normalnim zavode a tohle jsem tam nasel a vycetl :
si_subsec

Myslim ze ty 1/10 uz stejne budeme resit jen pro SIACy ... ne ?

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

@xkenia Nemelo to cteni subsec. ze SIACu uz sveho casu implementovano OB2000 (verze na WOC2014) ?

@xkenia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xkenia commented Jun 23, 2023

@xkenia Nemelo to cteni subsec. ze SIACu uz sveho casu implementovano OB2000 (verze na WOC2014) ?

muselo, protoze jsme na 1/10 jeli, nejsem si dokonce jist, zda to OB2000 nemelo na 1/100s, ale orezaval na tu 1/10s

@xkenia
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xkenia commented Jun 23, 2023

Myslim ze ty 1/10 uz stejne budeme resit jen pro SIACy ... ne ?

Jo, merit to na 1/10 nema u jinych cipu nez SIACu smysl.

@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jun 23, 2023

podle toho, co pisi tady https://docs.sportident.com/user-guide/en/config.html#advanced-settings to jde s kazdym cipem, pokud se cilova krabicka naprogramuje na Sprint 4ms

Jinak si myslim, ze ani SIAC v sobe msec neuklada, pokud krabicka neni v Sprint 4ms modu

Dalsi zpusob, ktery znam je, ze pokud se cilova krabicka pripoji k seriaku, tak PUNCH, ktery vysle, obsahuje msec. Sice se to nezapise do cipu, ale sparovat se to da, toto je myslim v QE uz naimplementovano.

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

2023-06-25 14_50_06-Window
Tak jsem zkusil SIACem krome razeni Beacon i obcas SIACem orazit vsunutim do otvoru - oznaceno cervenou hvezdickou.
Takze plati ze SIAC pri razeni v BEACON rezimu na normalne nastavene kontrole zapisuje presnejsi cas ne po vterinach.
A minimalne pres SPORTident Config+ jde i stejne vycist. Zadne sprintove nastaveni ani u kontroly ani u vycitani.

@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jun 25, 2023

2023-06-25 14_50_06-Window Tak jsem zkusil SIACem krome razeni Beacon i obcas SIACem orazit vsunutim do otvoru - oznaceno cervenou hvezdickou. Takze plati ze SIAC pri razeni v BEACON rezimu na normalne nastavene kontrole zapisuje presnejsi cas ne po vterinach. A minimalne pres SPORTident Config+ jde i stejne vycist. Zadne sprintove nastaveni ani u kontroly ani u vycitani.

Ja ti to verim, jenze nemam ani poneti, kam by si ty msec ulozil. Kdyz vycitas SIAC, dostanes uplne stejny punch-record jako z karty type6, takze otazka zni: Kde se to SIConfig dozvedel?

image

@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jun 26, 2023

Kdyz bys dokazal nejak ziskat raw data z tohoto cipu, tak se zahada hned vyresi.

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

Zatim jsem nasel neco na githubu :

@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jun 26, 2023

v commit message neco je, ale v kodu neni nic. https://github.com/sportorg/sireader/blob/79abf4e8192143deb6e5e20b6f4e48064d32ec08/sireader.py#L806 tady je cteni milisekund, ale jenom pro start, start_r, finish a finish_r, ne pro ostatni razeni. Coz je v souladu s dokumentaci.

@kamilpipek
Copy link

kamilpipek commented Jun 26, 2023 via email

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

arnost00 commented Jun 26, 2023

Kdyz bys dokazal nejak ziskat raw data z tohoto cipu, tak se zahada hned vyresi.

Zkusil jsem to ...
cardmemory_8076002.zip

Ten druhej cip ma i bezkontaktni cil.
cardmemory_8047125.zip
2023-06-26 23_08_06-Window

@fvacek fvacek changed the title Casy na 1/10s Result times with 1/10s precision Jul 28, 2023
@fvacek fvacek self-assigned this Jul 28, 2023
fvacek pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2023
@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jul 28, 2023

V soucasnosti pouzivame format casu mmm.ss, budeme to muset asi zmenit na mmm:ss.z

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

arnost00 commented Jul 28, 2023

Priklad z JWOCu 2012, vysledky sprintu - Result sprint / pdf

Neco z Eventoru - WOC 2012 Result sprint

@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jul 29, 2023

Priklad z JWOCu 2012, vysledky sprintu - Result sprint / pdf

michat desteinnou carku a tecku, mi prijde dost brutalni

@fvacek
Copy link
Collaborator

fvacek commented Jul 29, 2023

Neco z Eventoru - WOC 2012 Result sprint

tohle bych pouzil

@arnost00
Copy link
Contributor

tohle bych pouzil

Souhlasim. Urcite bych jako vzor bral Eventor.

fvacek pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants