Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

在论文表1和表13中，RandlaNet的全监督性能在chair和table类上性能差距大，请问是不是填反了 #15

Open
co-br opened this issue Apr 16, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

在论文表1和表13中，RandlaNet的全监督性能在chair和table类上性能差距大，请问是不是填反了 #15

co-br opened this issue Apr 16, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@co-br
Copy link

co-br commented Apr 16, 2023

在论文表1和表13中，RandlaNet的全监督性能在table和chair类上性能差距大，
表1这两个类的性能分别是：77.2和85.2
表13中这两个类的性能分别是：88.04和78.53
根据您公开的RandlaNet代码，我跑出的分别是77.83和85.28，请问论文表13中这两个类的全监督性能是否填反了。
期待您的回复，谢谢！
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@co-br