You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm curious whether Pandora team plans to submit this hybrid ERC20+ERC721 standard to the EIPs repository. Currently, there's some confusion about the final function interfaces and events, as well as the rationale behind them (some of which have changed from the legacy implementation). Without an official standard, it becomes particularly challenging for other projects to, for instance, implement their own 404 smart contracts with different performance tradeoffs while ensuring consistency with the specification. Also difficult for wallets, indexers and exchanges to know what data to read.
In the current codebase, the event Transfer(...) and event Approval(...) have been completely removed. Do we expect Etherscan, wallets, and other indexers to track the new ERC20Transfer, ERC20Approval, ERC721Transfer, etc., events? Otherwise I don't think token balances won't show on Web3 wallets / and contract won't be recognized as token on Etherscan.
I'm willing to assist with the draft if there are plans to proceed. Any information would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm curious whether Pandora team plans to submit this hybrid ERC20+ERC721 standard to the EIPs repository. Currently, there's some confusion about the final function interfaces and events, as well as the rationale behind them (some of which have changed from the legacy implementation). Without an official standard, it becomes particularly challenging for other projects to, for instance, implement their own 404 smart contracts with different performance tradeoffs while ensuring consistency with the specification. Also difficult for wallets, indexers and exchanges to know what data to read.
In the current codebase, the
event Transfer(...)
andevent Approval(...)
have been completely removed. Do we expect Etherscan, wallets, and other indexers to track the newERC20Transfer
,ERC20Approval
,ERC721Transfer
, etc., events? Otherwise I don't think token balances won't show on Web3 wallets / and contract won't be recognized as token on Etherscan.I'm willing to assist with the draft if there are plans to proceed. Any information would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: