Volunteer Management(GSoC) #2567
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily focus on enhancing the functionality of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (2)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 41
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/event_info_page_test.dart (2)
101-114: Comprehensive test case for the event info section.The expanded test case for the event info section is thorough and covers multiple important aspects. It verifies the presence of the tab bar, the 'Info' text, and the
EventInfoBodywidget, ensuring that the essential components are rendered correctly. Additionally, it checks for the visibility of the delete button when the user is the event creator, which is a crucial scenario to test.However, consider adding assertions or expectations after tapping the delete button to verify the expected behavior, such as navigating to a confirmation dialog or updating the UI state.
118-133: Improved precision in testing the FloatingActionButton.The updated test case for the
FloatingActionButtonnow uses a specific key to find the button, which is a good practice. It makes the test more precise and less prone to false positives.However, consider adding assertions or expectations after tapping the button to verify the expected behavior, such as navigating to the registration screen or updating the UI state.
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart (2)
37-41: Consider adding more test cases.The test verifies the success scenario of
getCurrentOrgUsersListby checking the length of the returned list and theidof the first user. However, it relies on specific mocked data.Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios, such as:
- When the user list is empty.
- When there are more than 2 users.
- When the user IDs are different.
This will make the test more robust and less dependent on the specific mocked data.
100-122: Verify the model state after deleting the group.The test covers the success scenario of deleting a volunteer group and verifies that the
removeVolunteerGroupmethod of theEventServiceis called with the correct arguments.However, it would be better to also verify the state of the model after deleting the group. For example, you could check if the deleted group is removed from the model's list of volunteer groups.
Consider adding an assertion to verify the model state after calling
deleteVolunteerGroup.lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/event_info_page.dart (2)
59-60: Localize the tab labels for internationalization support.The tab labels "Info" and "Volunteers" are hard-coded strings. To support multiple languages and enhance the app's accessibility, consider using localized strings via the
AppLocalizationsclass.Apply this diff to localize the tab labels:
- tabs: const [ - Tab(text: "Info"), - Tab(text: "Volunteers"), - ], + tabs: [ + Tab( + text: AppLocalizations.of(context)!.strictTranslate('Info'), + ), + Tab( + text: AppLocalizations.of(context)!.strictTranslate('Volunteers'), + ), + ],
76-76: Replace hardcoded image URL with dynamic or asset-based image.The image URL
'https://picsum.photos/id/26/200/300'appears to be a placeholder. For a production application, it is advisable to use images from your assets directory or retrieve them dynamically based on the event data to ensure reliability and relevance.Consider updating the image source as follows:
- background: Image.network( - 'https://picsum.photos/id/26/200/300', - fit: BoxFit.fill, - ), + background: Image.asset( + 'assets/images/event_background.png', + fit: BoxFit.fill, + ),Or fetch the image URL from the
model.eventdata if available.lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/event_info_view_model.dart (2)
27-27: Consider removing thelatekeyword for immediately initializedfinalvariables.Since
_volunteerGroupsis initialized immediately, thelatekeyword is unnecessary and can be omitted.Apply this diff to simplify the declaration:
-late final List<EventVolunteerGroup> _volunteerGroups = []; +final List<EventVolunteerGroup> _volunteerGroups = [];
156-167: Avoid setting the state to idle before notifying listeners.In the
fetchVolunteerGroupsmethod, consider callingnotifyListeners()after setting the state to idle to ensure the UI reflects the latest data changes.Apply this diff:
_volunteerGroups.addAll(result); - setState(ViewState.idle); notifyListeners(); + setState(ViewState.idle); } catch (e) {lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/manage_volunteer_group_view_model.dart (2)
35-39: Remove unused_isFetchingVolunteerspropertyThe
_isFetchingVolunteersvariable is declared, and a getter is provided, but the variable is never updated or used within the class. Keeping unused code can lead to confusion and maintainability issues.Consider removing the
_isFetchingVolunteersvariable and its getter:-final bool _isFetchingVolunteers = false; -bool get isFetchingVolunteers => _isFetchingVolunteers;
11-14: Improve documentation comments for better clarityWhile the methods have documentation comments, the formatting can be improved for consistency and readability. For instance, parameters and return values can be documented using the standard Dart doc comment syntax with
@paramand@returntags.Consider updating the comments:
/// Initializes the view model with the given event and volunteer group. /// /// @param parentEvent The event associated with the volunteer group. /// @param group The volunteer group to be managed. /// /// @return None Future<void> initialize(Event parentEvent, EventVolunteerGroup group) async { // method body }Also applies to: 40-47, 82-90, 115-121, 139-146, 167-176
lib/utils/event_queries.dart (1)
332-339: Ensure proper indentation and formatting in multiline stringsThe GraphQL query strings within the methods have inconsistent indentation, which can affect readability. Properly indenting the nested fields improves the maintainability of the code.
Example of improved indentation:
volunteers{ - _id - response - user{ - _id - firstName - lastName - } + _id + response + user{ + _id + firstName + lastName + } }test/helpers/test_helpers.mocks.dart (1)
1367-1437: Specify precise return types inMockEventServicemethodsThe methods
createVolunteerGroup,removeVolunteerGroup,addVolunteerToGroup,removeVolunteerFromGroup, andupdateVolunteerGroupall returnFuture<dynamic>. To improve type safety and code clarity, consider specifying the exact return types. If these methods do not return any meaningful data, you can useFuture<void>.Apply the following changes:
- _i5.Future<dynamic> createVolunteerGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => + _i5.Future<void> createVolunteerGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => - _i5.Future<dynamic> removeVolunteerGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => + _i5.Future<void> removeVolunteerGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => - _i5.Future<dynamic> addVolunteerToGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => + _i5.Future<void> addVolunteerToGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => - _i5.Future<dynamic> removeVolunteerFromGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => + _i5.Future<void> removeVolunteerFromGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => - _i5.Future<dynamic> updateVolunteerGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) => + _i5.Future<void> updateVolunteerGroup(Map<String, dynamic>? variables) =>
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (26)
- .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (8 hunks)
- lib/constants/routing_constants.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/locator.dart (2 hunks)
- lib/models/events/event_volunteer.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/models/events/event_volunteer_group.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/router.dart (3 hunks)
- lib/services/database_mutation_functions.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/services/event_service.dart (3 hunks)
- lib/utils/event_queries.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/event_info_view_model.dart (4 hunks)
- lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/manage_volunteer_group_view_model.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/event_info_page.dart (2 hunks)
- lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_volunteer_group.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/volunteer_groups_screen.dart (1 hunks)
- test/helpers/test_helpers.mocks.dart (31 hunks)
- test/helpers/test_locator.dart (2 hunks)
- test/model_tests/events/event_volunteer_group_test.dart (1 hunks)
- test/model_tests/events/event_volunteer_test.dart (1 hunks)
- test/router_test.dart (4 hunks)
- test/service_tests/event_service_test.dart (2 hunks)
- test/utils/event_queries_test.dart (1 hunks)
- test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/event_info_view_model_test.dart (2 hunks)
- test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart (1 hunks)
- test/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_volunteer_group_test.dart (1 hunks)
- test/views/after_auth_screens/events/volunteer_groups_screen_test.dart (1 hunks)
- test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/event_info_page_test.dart (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/pull-request.yml
Additional comments not posted (53)
lib/models/events/event_volunteer.dart (4)
1-4: LGTM!The import statements are correctly defined and necessary for the
EventVolunteerclass.
5-72: LGTM!The
EventVolunteerclass is well-implemented and follows the best practices:
- The constructor initializes all the properties correctly.
- The
fromJsonfactory constructor handles null checks and creates instances of related classes from the provided map structure.- The class properties are appropriately typed and have clear documentation comments.
19-41: LGTM!The
fromJsonfactory constructor is well-implemented:
- It correctly creates an instance of
EventVolunteerfrom the provided map structure.- It handles null checks for the related classes and creates their instances using their respective
fromJsonconstructors.- It passes the
fromOrgparameter astruewhen creating instances of theUserclass, indicating that the user is associated with an organization.
43-71: LGTM!The properties of the
EventVolunteerclass are well-defined:
- Each property has a clear documentation comment describing its purpose.
- The properties are appropriately typed, including nullable types for optional or missing data.
lib/models/events/event_volunteer_group.dart (4)
1-4: LGTM!The import statements are correct and necessary for using the
Event,EventVolunteer, andUserclasses in this file.
5-46: LGTM!The
EventVolunteerGroupclass definition and factory constructor are properly implemented. The JSON properties are correctly mapped to the class properties, and the related entities (User,Event, andEventVolunteer) are properly instantiated using their respectivefromJsonconstructors.
48-73: LGTM!The properties of the
EventVolunteerGroupclass are defined with the correct data types and are properly documented using clear and concise comments. The use of nullable types is appropriate for the given context.
1-74: Great work on theEventVolunteerGroupclass!The class is well-structured, properly documented, and follows good coding practices. The JSON mapping and handling of related entities are implemented correctly. The class maintains a single responsibility and does not contain any unrelated functionality.
Overall, this is a solid implementation of the
EventVolunteerGroupclass, and I don't have any further suggestions for improvement.test/model_tests/events/event_volunteer_test.dart (1)
9-76: Great job on the comprehensive test forEventVolunteerdeserialization!The test follows the AAA pattern and covers all the fields of the
EventVolunteermodel. It ensures that the deserialization process works as expected by comparing the deserialized object with the original object.The test is well-structured, uses meaningful variable names, and enhances the overall test suite for the event volunteer management feature.
lib/constants/routing_constants.dart (2)
118-119: LGTM!The new constant
volunteerGroupScreenis declared correctly and follows the existing naming convention. The route string is unique and does not conflict with other routes.
121-122: LGTM!The new constant
manageVolunteerGroupis declared correctly and follows the existing naming convention. The route string is unique and does not conflict with other routes.test/model_tests/events/event_volunteer_group_test.dart (1)
9-114: LGTM!The test case for the
fromJsonmethod of theEventVolunteerGroupmodel is well-structured and covers the deserialization of the model and its related entities. It ensures that thefromJsonmethod correctly maps the JSON fields to the model properties.The test case creates sample data for the
EventVolunteerGroupmodel, including related models likeUser,Event, andEventVolunteer, and compares the deserialized object with the original object. This helps verify the correctness of the deserialization process.Good job on adding this test case to validate the
fromJsonmethod of theEventVolunteerGroupmodel!test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/event_info_page_test.dart (2)
93-99: LGTM!The test case for verifying the appearance of the tab bar is well-structured and follows best practices. It properly mocks network images, pumps the widget, and makes assertions on the presence of the tab bar using a specific key.
136-152: Comprehensive test case for the volunteer section behavior.The new test case for validating the behavior of the volunteer section when the user swipes left is well-designed and covers an important user interaction scenario. It verifies the initial state where the
VolunteerGroupsScreenis not visible, and theEventInfoBodyis displayed. Then, it simulates the swipe left action using a drag gesture and asserts the expected changes in the UI, with theVolunteerGroupsScreenbecoming visible and theEventInfoBodydisappearing.This test case provides good coverage for the volunteer section behavior and ensures that the swiping functionality works as intended.
test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/manage_volunteer_group_view_model_test.dart (4)
26-35: LGTM!The test initializes the
ManageVolunteerGroupViewModelcorrectly and verifies the expected state. Good job on setting up the test data and making the necessary assertions.
43-71: LGTM!The test covers the success scenario of adding a volunteer to a group. Mocking the
EventServiceand setting up the expected result is a good approach. The assertions verify that the model's state is updated correctly after callingaddVolunteerToGroup.
73-98: LGTM!The test covers the success scenario of removing a volunteer from a group. Mocking the
EventServiceand setting up the expected result is a good approach. The assertion verifies that the model's state is updated correctly after callingremoveVolunteerFromGroup.
124-157: LGTM!The test covers the success scenario of updating a volunteer group. Mocking the
EventServiceand setting up the expected result is a good approach. The assertions verify that theEventVolunteerGroupinstance is updated with the correct values after callingupdateVolunteerGroup.test/view_model_tests/after_auth_view_model_tests/event_view_model_tests/event_info_view_model_test.dart (4)
91-128: LGTM!The test case for the successful creation of a volunteer group is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It sets up the necessary mocks, calls the
createVolunteerGroupmethod with the appropriate parameters, and makes the required assertions to verify the functionality.
130-147: LGTM!The test case for the failure scenario when creating a volunteer group is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It sets up the necessary mocks, calls the
createVolunteerGroupmethod with the appropriate parameters, and asserts that the new group returned is null when an exception is thrown by the event service.
149-170: LGTM!The test case for the successful fetching of volunteer groups is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It sets up the necessary mocks, calls the
fetchVolunteerGroupsmethod with the appropriate event ID, and asserts that the model's volunteer groups list is updated with the mocked volunteer group.
172-184: LGTM!The test case for the failure scenario when fetching volunteer groups is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It sets up the necessary mocks, clears the model's volunteer groups list, calls the
fetchVolunteerGroupsmethod with the appropriate event ID, and asserts that the model's volunteer groups list remains empty when an exception is thrown by the event service.test/utils/event_queries_test.dart (6)
150-170: LGTM!The test case for
createVolunteerGrouplooks good. It correctly compares the actual output of the method with the expected GraphQL mutation string.
172-184: LGTM!The test case for
removeVolunteerGrouplooks good. It correctly compares the actual output of the method with the expected GraphQL mutation string after trimming whitespace.
186-220: LGTM!The test case for
addVolunteerToGrouplooks good. It correctly compares the actual output of the method with the expected GraphQL mutation string after removing all whitespace.
221-232: LGTM!The test case for
removeVolunteerFromGrouplooks good. It correctly compares the actual output of the method with the expected GraphQL mutation string after trimming whitespace.
234-254: LGTM!The test case for
updateVolunteerGrouplooks good. It correctly compares the actual output of the method with the expected GraphQL mutation string after removing all whitespace.
256-286: LGTM!The test case for
fetchVolunteerGroupsByEventlooks good. It correctly compares the actual output of the method with the expected GraphQL query string after removing all whitespace.test/helpers/test_locator.dart (2)
34-34: LGTM!The import statement for
ManageVolunteerGroupViewModelis valid and necessary for registering the view model in the locator.
125-125: LGTM!The factory registration for
ManageVolunteerGroupViewModelis correctly implemented and will allow the application to create instances of the view model for testing purposes.lib/locator.dart (2)
33-33: LGTM!The import statement for
ManageVolunteerGroupViewModelis correctly added and necessary for registering the view model in the locator.
153-153: LGTM!The
ManageVolunteerGroupViewModelis correctly registered in thesetupLocatorfunction using theregisterFactorymethod. This allows the view model to be accessed from anywhere in the codebase using the locator, enabling dependency injection and promoting loose coupling between classes.lib/services/database_mutation_functions.dart (1)
82-82: LGTM! The change ensures fetching the latest data from the network.The introduction of the
fetchPolicy: FetchPolicy.networkOnlyparameter in theQueryOptionsconstructor within thegqlAuthQuerymethod ensures that the query always fetches the latest data from the network, disregarding any cached data.This change can be beneficial in scenarios where real-time data is crucial, and stale cached data should be avoided. However, it's important to consider the potential impact on performance and network usage, as every query will now make a network request, even if the data hasn't changed.
Consider evaluating the specific requirements of your application and determining if this behavior aligns with your needs. In cases where cached data is acceptable and network usage needs to be optimized, you may want to explore alternative fetch policies or implement a more granular caching strategy.
lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/volunteer_groups_screen.dart (4)
8-23: LGTM!The
VolunteerGroupsScreenclass follows the standard practices for creating a stateful widget in Flutter. The constructor takes the required parameters, and thecreateStatemethod is overridden correctly.
33-43: LGTM!The
_formatDatemethod correctly formats date strings into the 'yyyy-MM-dd' format. It also handles invalid dates by returning appropriate messages.
46-191: LGTM!The
buildmethod follows the standard structure for building a widget tree in Flutter. It includes a floating action button for adding a new volunteer group and a list view that displays the existing volunteer groups. The UI components are well-structured and use appropriate styling.
201-276: LGTM!The
_showCreateGroupDialogmethod correctly creates and displays a dialog for creating a new volunteer group. The dialog includes input fields for group name and volunteers required, and it handles form submission appropriately. The method uses theEventInfoViewModelto create a new volunteer group and navigates to the manage volunteer screen upon successful creation.lib/router.dart (3)
6-6: LGTM!The import statement for
event_volunteer_group.dartis necessary and correctly added.
13-13: LGTM!The import statement for
event_info_view_model.dartis necessary and correctly added.
317-331: LGTM!The new routes for managing volunteer groups are correctly defined and integrated with the existing routing system. The routes expect the appropriate arguments and correctly build the respective screens using
MaterialPageRoute.The addition of these routes enhances the navigation capabilities of the application by allowing navigation to screens specifically designed for managing volunteer groups associated with events.
test/service_tests/event_service_test.dart (6)
234-271: LGTM!The test case for the
createVolunteerGroupmethod is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It correctly mocks thegqlAuthMutationmethod and asserts the response data.
273-299: LGTM!The test case for the
removeVolunteerGroupmethod is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It correctly mocks thegqlAuthMutationmethod and asserts the response data.
301-330: LGTM!The test case for the
addVolunteerToGroupmethod is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It correctly mocks thegqlAuthMutationmethod and asserts the response data.
332-358: LGTM!The test case for the
removeVolunteerFromGroupmethod is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It correctly mocks thegqlAuthMutationmethod and asserts the response data.
360-393: LGTM!The test case for the
updateVolunteerGroupmethod is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It correctly mocks thegqlAuthMutationmethod and asserts the response data.
395-434: LGTM!The test case for the
fetchVolunteerGroupsByEventmethod is well-structured and covers the expected behavior. It correctly mocks thegqlAuthQuerymethod and asserts the response data, ensuring that the returned list of volunteer groups matches the expected length and group IDs.test/router_test.dart (2)
416-430: LGTM!The new widget test for the default volunteer groups screen route looks good. It correctly verifies the expected route and widget, following the same pattern as other routing tests in the file.
432-446: Looks good!The new widget test for the default manage volunteer group screen route is implemented correctly. It verifies the expected route and widget, following the established pattern in the file.
lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/manage_volunteer_group_view_model.dart (2)
17-17: Ensureeventis initialized before useThe
eventvariable is declared aslate, meaning it must be initialized before being accessed. It is set in theinitializemethod, but there's a risk that other methods might access it before initialization.Ensure that
initializeis called before any other method that usesevent, or consider initializing it in the constructor:ManageVolunteerGroupViewModel(this.event); late Event event;Also applies to: 51-51
184-190: Verify the correctness of theupdateVolunteerGroupAPI variablesIn the
updateVolunteerGroupmethod, thevariablesmap includes an'id'key and a nested'data'map. Ensure that the API expects this structure and that all required fields are included.Run the following script to check the expected parameters of
updateVolunteerGroup:Verification successful
To ensure complete verification, we need to check the GraphQL mutation definition. Let's search for it in the codebase.
The
updateVolunteerGroupAPI variables are correctly structuredThe implementation of the
updateVolunteerGroupmethod in the view model is correct and consistent with the GraphQL mutation definition. The API expects an 'id' parameter and a nested 'data' object, which is exactly how the variables are structured in the code:final variables = { 'id': group.id, 'data': { 'eventId': eventId, 'name': name, 'volunteersRequired': volunteersRequired, }, };This structure matches the GraphQL mutation definition:
mutation UpdateEventVolunteerGroup($id: ID!, $data: UpdateEventVolunteerGroupInput!) { updateEventVolunteerGroup(id: $id, data: $data) { _id name volunteersRequired } }The implementation is consistent across the view model, service layer, and the GraphQL mutation definition. No changes are required.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the expected parameters for the updateVolunteerGroup API method. # Test: Search for the definition of updateVolunteerGroup in the codebase. # Expect: To find the method and confirm the required variables. rg --type dart 'Future<.*> updateVolunteerGroup\(' -A 10Length of output: 2838
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the GraphQL mutation definition for updating a volunteer group rg --type dart 'updateVolunteerGroupMutation' -A 15Length of output: 7593
lib/services/event_service.dart (1)
5-5: [Approved] ImportingEventVolunteerGroupmodelThe import statement correctly adds the
EventVolunteerGroupmodel, which is necessary for the new volunteer management functionality.test/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_volunteer_group_test.dart (2)
25-63: LGTMThe
getTestEventfunction is properly set up for testing, and the event object is correctly initialized with appropriate default values.
38-39: Verify the validity of date formats in test eventThe
startDateandendDatefields are set to"00/00/0000"and"12/12/9999", which might not conform to valid date formats. This could potentially cause parsing errors in the tests or the components that use these dates. Please ensure that these dates are valid and won't lead to unexpected behavior.Run the following script to check for potential date parsing issues:
Verification successful
Test dates are intentional and do not impact application code
The date formats "00/00/0000" and "12/12/9999" in the test files are intentionally used as placeholder or edge case values for testing purposes. These specific dates are not present in the actual application code. The codebase demonstrates proper handling of various date formats, including "MM/dd/yyyy" and "yyyy-MM-dd", using the DateFormat class from the intl package.
No changes are necessary for the test data. However, it may be beneficial to add a comment in the test files explaining the purpose of these specific date values for improved clarity and maintainability.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for date parsing of 'startDate' and 'endDate' in the codebase. # Test: Look for any parsing of 'startDate' and 'endDate' that might fail with invalid dates. rg --type dart "DateTime\.parse\((.*startDate|.*endDate)" -A 2Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further investigation of date usage and parsing in the codebase # Search for usage of startDate and endDate echo "Usage of startDate and endDate:" rg --type dart "startDate|endDate" -A 2 # Look for potential custom date parsing functions echo -e "\nPotential custom date parsing functions:" rg --type dart "function.*Date|Date.*function" -A 2 # Search for specific date strings echo -e "\nUsage of specific date strings:" rg --type dart "00/00/0000|12/12/9999"Length of output: 30847
lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/event_info_view_model.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/view_model/after_auth_view_models/event_view_models/event_info_view_model.dart
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/views/after_auth_screens/events/manage_volunteer_group.dart
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@Dante291 Please fix the conflicting files so we can merge |
Dante291
dismissed stale reviews from noman2002 and coderabbitai
via
f34e6bc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- test/helpers/test_helpers.mocks.dart (109 hunks)
- test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/edit_event_page_test.dart (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/widget_tests/after_auth_screens/events/edit_event_page_test.dart
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2567 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 96.33% 96.42% +0.08%
===========================================
Files 174 179 +5
Lines 8754 9191 +437
===========================================
+ Hits 8433 8862 +429
- Misses 321 329 +8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes its ready to get merged |
palisadoes
merged commit e0050d4
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Adding support for event volunteers
Issue Number:
Fixes #2539
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
volunteer.mp4
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Yes
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests