Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Improve GitHub Issue Template Guidelines Placement #42

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 27, 2024

Conversation

PPeitsch
Copy link
Owner

@PPeitsch PPeitsch commented Dec 27, 2024

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines??
Fixes #41

Description

Relocated guidelines section in GitHub issue templates to improve user experience:

  • Moved guidelines checkbox section below the first content field
  • Maintained all existing guideline requirements
  • Reduced friction in issue creation workflow
  • Ensured clear visibility of contribution guidelines
  • Implemented in all issue templates (bug, feature, documentation)
    Rationale:
  • Current placement interrupts natural issue reporting flow
  • New placement allows more intuitive template progression
  • Keeps all compliance checks intact

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would break existing functionality)
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • CI/CD related changes
  • Test coverage improvement
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist

  • I have followed the project's coding style guidelines
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests pass locally
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added type hints where applicable
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md
  • My changes generate no new mypy warnings
  • I have checked code formatting with black (line length 100)
  • I have run isort for import sorting
  • My PR is based on the latest main branch and has no conflicts
  • I have added/updated docstrings in NumPy format

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added checkboxes to issue templates for bug reports, documentation, and feature requests, ensuring users agree to follow Contributing Guidelines and confirm issue searches.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved user experience of GitHub issue templates by relocating and enhancing the guidelines checkbox section.
  • Chores

    • Updated changelog to reflect changes and fixes for version 0.3.2.
    • Incremented version number from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub issue templates for bug reports, documentation, and feature requests by reinstating a checkboxes section. This section requires users to agree to the project's Contributing Guidelines and confirm they have searched for similar issues before submitting. The changes are consistent across all three issue template files, ensuring a uniform approach to issue submission guidelines.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yaml Added checkboxes section with guidelines agreement and issue search confirmation
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs.yaml Added checkboxes section with guidelines agreement and issue search confirmation
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature.yaml Added checkboxes section with guidelines agreement, issue search confirmation, and implementation understanding
CHANGELOG.md Updated to include version v0.3.2 and changes related to issue template user experience
docs/changelog.rst Updated to include version 0.3.2 and changes related to issue template user experience
src/pkynetics/__about__.py Updated version from "0.3.1" to "0.3.2"

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve GitHub Issue Template Guidelines Placement (#41)

Possibly related PRs

  • [DOCS] Enhance documentation structure and version format #32: This PR enhances the documentation structure and version format, which includes updates to the CHANGELOG.md that are relevant to the changes made in the main PR regarding the issue templates.
  • Fix/coverage #36: This PR updates the CHANGELOG.md to reflect changes related to GitHub Actions, which is indirectly related to the overall documentation and user experience improvements mentioned in the main PR.

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through issue lands we go,
Checkboxes dancing in template's flow
Guidelines checked with bunny delight
Ensuring issues are crisp and bright!
Compliance hops, no issues in sight 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Relocated guidelines section in GitHub issue templates to improve user experience:

- Moved guidelines checkbox section below the first content field
- Maintained all existing guideline requirements
- Reduced friction in issue creation workflow
- Ensured clear visibility of contribution guidelines
- Implemented in all issue templates (bug, feature, documentation)

Rationale:
- Current placement interrupts natural issue reporting flow
- New placement allows more intuitive template progression
- Keeps all compliance checks intact
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/pkynetics/__about__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yaml (1)

101-110: LGTM! Consistent implementation with contextual improvements.

The guidelines section maintains consistency with other templates while appropriately adapting the verification checkbox text for bug reports ("similar issues" vs "hasn't been reported before").

Consider standardizing the checkbox text across all templates for better maintainability, though the current context-specific wording is also valid.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef00a57 and 2382aaf.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs.yaml (1)

63-72: LGTM! Guidelines section properly positioned.

The placement of the checkboxes section after the content fields aligns well with the PR objectives, creating a more natural flow for issue creation.

Let's verify the Contributing Guidelines link:

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual content of the CONTRIBUTING.md file to ensure it's properly linked and contains relevant guidelines.


Contributing Guidelines link is valid and points to a comprehensive document

The Contributing Guidelines link in the issue template points to a valid and well-structured document that exists at .github/CONTRIBUTING.md. The document is comprehensive, containing detailed sections about standards, issue reporting, pull requests, and other contribution aspects, making it a valuable reference for contributors.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the Contributing Guidelines file exists and is accessible
if [ -f ".github/CONTRIBUTING.md" ]; then
    echo "Contributing Guidelines file exists"
    # Check if it contains actual content
    if [ -s ".github/CONTRIBUTING.md" ]; then
        echo "Contributing Guidelines file is not empty"
    else
        echo "Warning: Contributing Guidelines file is empty"
    fi
else
    echo "Warning: Contributing Guidelines file not found"
fi

Length of output: 247


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display the content of CONTRIBUTING.md
cat .github/CONTRIBUTING.md

Length of output: 4881

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (1)

15-18: Remove the empty bullet point on line 18.

There's an empty bullet point that should be removed to maintain changelog cleanliness.

Apply this diff:

 ### Fixed
 - Restructured issue template to reduce friction in reporting process
 - Maintained all existing guideline compliance checks
-- 
docs/changelog.rst (1)

12-17: Consider consolidating similar changelog entries.

The current entries in the "Changed" section are somewhat redundant. Consider consolidating them into more specific, non-overlapping points.

-Changed
-^^^^^^^
-- Improved GitHub issue template user experience
-- Relocated guidelines checkbox section in issue templates
-- Enhanced template layout for more intuitive issue creation workflow
+Changed
+^^^^^^^
+- Relocated guidelines checkbox section below first content field in GitHub issue templates
+- Enhanced template layout for more intuitive issue creation workflow
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2382aaf and 9e3caca.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/changelog.rst (1 hunks)
  • src/pkynetics/__about__.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/pkynetics/about.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

8-14: LGTM! Changes section accurately reflects the PR objectives.

The entries clearly document the improvements to the GitHub issue template user experience and the relocation of the guidelines section, aligning well with the PR objectives.


8-17: LGTM! Changelog format follows Keep a Changelog standards.

The entries are well-organized, properly categorized, and follow the recommended format with clear, action-oriented descriptions.

docs/changelog.rst (1)

9-11: LGTM! Version and date are appropriate.

The version increment to 0.3.2 is appropriate for these non-breaking changes to documentation and templates. The date is current.

Comment on lines +18 to +22
Fixed
^^^^^
- Restructured issue template to reduce friction in reporting process
- Maintained all existing guideline compliance checks

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Move template restructuring to "Changed" section.

The entries in the "Fixed" section don't describe actual fixes but rather improvements to the template structure. These should be moved to the "Changed" section since they're intentional improvements rather than bug fixes.

-Fixed
-^^^^^
-- Restructured issue template to reduce friction in reporting process
-- Maintained all existing guideline compliance checks
+Changed
+^^^^^^^
+- Relocated guidelines checkbox section below first content field in GitHub issue templates
+- Enhanced template layout for more intuitive issue creation workflow
+- Maintained all existing guideline compliance requirements
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Fixed
^^^^^
- Restructured issue template to reduce friction in reporting process
- Maintained all existing guideline compliance checks
Changed
^^^^^^^
- Relocated guidelines checkbox section below first content field in GitHub issue templates
- Enhanced template layout for more intuitive issue creation workflow
- Maintained all existing guideline compliance requirements

- Updated __about__.py with new version 0.3.2
- Added changelog entry for v0.3.2 in Markdown and RST formats
@PPeitsch PPeitsch merged commit 2a42bd7 into main Dec 27, 2024
7 checks passed
@PPeitsch PPeitsch deleted the feature/templates-ux branch December 28, 2024 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

⚡ [Feature]: Improve GitHub Issue Template Guidelines Placement
1 participant