Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/coverage #36

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

Fix/coverage #36

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

PPeitsch
Copy link
Owner

@PPeitsch PPeitsch commented Dec 26, 2024

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

Description

Remove explicit permission blocks from GitHub Actions workflow to fix Codecov badge updates while maintaining security through default permissions model.

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would break existing functionality)
  • Documentation update
  • Performance improvement
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • CI/CD related changes
  • Test coverage improvement
  • Other (please describe):

Checklist

  • I have followed the project's coding style guidelines
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests pass locally
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added type hints where applicable
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md
  • My changes generate no new mypy warnings
  • I have checked code formatting with black (line length 100)
  • I have run isort for import sorting
  • My PR is based on the latest main branch and has no conflicts
  • I have added/updated docstrings in NumPy format

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Streamlined permissions for the test and publish jobs in the workflow.
    • Updated job names for clarity, including Python version in the test job.
    • Clarified execution conditions for the publish job to ensure it runs only on specific tag pushes.
  • Documentation
    • Added a new version entry [v0.3.1] to the CHANGELOG and documentation, addressing GitHub Actions permissions issues.
  • Version Update
    • Incremented the version number from "0.3.0" to "0.3.1".

Remove explicit permission blocks to resolve Codecov badge updates while
maintaining security through default permissions model.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in .github/workflows/test-and-publish.yaml. The changes focus on refining job permissions, updating job names, and clarifying job execution conditions. Specifically, the modifications involve removing certain write permissions for the test and publish jobs, adding the Python version to the test job name, and ensuring the publish job only runs on version tag pushes. Additionally, version updates are reflected in the changelog files and the version information.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/test-and-publish.yaml - Removed checks: write and pull-requests: write from test job permissions
- Removed contents: read from publish job permissions
- Updated test job name to include Python version
- Refined publish job trigger condition to specific version tag pushes
CHANGELOG.md - Added new version entry [v0.3.1] - 2024-12-26 with a "Fixed" section addressing GitHub Actions permissions issues
docs/changelog.rst - Added new version entry [v0.3.1] dated 2024-12-26 with a "Fixed" section for GitHub Actions permissions issues
src/pkynetics/__about__.py - Updated version from "0.3.0" to "0.3.1"

Possibly related PRs

  • [FIX] Modify version package #35: The changes in this PR involve updating the version number in src/pkynetics/__about__.py, which is relevant to the main PR's version update from "0.3.0" to "0.3.1".

Poem

🐰 Workflow Whiskers, Code so Bright
Permissions trimmed with rabbit might
Python versions dancing clear
Tags trigger publish without fear
CI/CD magic takes its flight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/pkynetics/__about__.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/pkynetics/__about__.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/changelog.rst (1)

12-14: Consider enhancing the fix description with more details.

While the current description is accurate, it could be more helpful to future readers by including:

  • The specific permissions that were causing issues
  • The solution approach (removing explicit permission blocks)
  • The impact (restored Codecov badge updates)

Consider expanding the description like this:

- GitHub Actions permissions causing Codecov testing and badge updates to fail
+ Fixed GitHub Actions permissions by removing explicit permission blocks that were preventing Codecov testing and badge updates from working correctly
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 507c46c and 06ed153.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/changelog.rst (1 hunks)
  • src/pkynetics/__about__.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/pkynetics/about.py
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/changelog.rst (1)

9-11: LGTM! Version bump and formatting are appropriate.

The version increment to v0.3.1 follows semantic versioning correctly for a bug fix, and the entry maintains consistency with the Keep a Changelog format.

CHANGELOG.md (2)

8-11: LGTM! Clear and well-formatted changelog entry.

The new version entry follows the Keep a Changelog format and appropriately documents the GitHub Actions permissions fix as a patch version increment.


8-8: Verify version consistency across the project.

Let's ensure the version number is consistently updated across all relevant files.

✅ Verification successful

Version numbers are consistent across the project

The version 0.3.1 is correctly set in:

  • src/pkynetics/__about__.py: __version__ = "0.3.1"
  • CHANGELOG.md: Current version entry is [v0.3.1] - 2024-12-26

The old version 0.3.0 only appears in the changelog files (CHANGELOG.md and docs/changelog.rst) as historical entries, which is expected and correct.

The project uses Hatch for version management with the version path correctly configured in pyproject.toml to read from src/pkynetics/__about__.py.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version consistency across the project
# Expected version: v0.3.1

# Check version in package files
echo "Checking version in package files..."
rg -l "0\.3\.1|version.*0\.3\.1" --type-add 'setup:*setup.{py,cfg}' --type setup
rg -l "0\.3\.1|version.*0\.3\.1" --type-add 'pyproject:*pyproject.toml' --type pyproject
rg -l "0\.3\.1|version.*0\.3\.1" src/pkynetics/__about__.py

# Check for any remaining old version references
echo -e "\nChecking for old version references..."
rg "0\.3\.0" --type python

Length of output: 647


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version consistency across the project with improved commands
# Expected version: v0.3.1

# Find and check version in package files
echo "Checking version in package files..."
fd "setup.py|setup.cfg|pyproject.toml" -x cat {}
echo -e "\nChecking version in __about__.py..."
cat src/pkynetics/__about__.py

# Check for any remaining old version references (0.3.0)
echo -e "\nChecking for old version references..."
rg "0\.3\.0"

Length of output: 3565

Updated version and changelog information regarding the fix explicit permission blocks to resolve Codecov badge updates while maintaining security through default permissions model.
@PPeitsch PPeitsch merged commit 090a210 into main Dec 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 26, 2024
21 tasks
@PPeitsch PPeitsch linked an issue Dec 27, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
27 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Project Infrastructure Setup (Phase 1)
1 participant