Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] Enhance documentation structure and version format #32

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

PPeitsch
Copy link
Owner

@PPeitsch PPeitsch commented Dec 13, 2024

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

Description

This PR improves the project's documentation structure and version formatting:

  • Updates README with professional format, badges, and improved organization
  • Adds CHANGELOG.md to root directory
  • Updates version format to include 'v' prefix (e.g., v0.1.0) across all documentation
  • Ensures consistency in changelog formats (MD and RST)

Type of Change

  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have followed the project's coding style guidelines
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests pass locally
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added type hints where applicable
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md
  • My changes generate no new mypy warnings
  • I have checked code formatting with black (line length 100)
  • I have run isort for import sorting
  • My PR is based on the latest main branch and has no conflicts
  • I have added/updated docstrings in NumPy format

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a CHANGELOG.md to document project changes.
    • Added a Code of Conduct, contributing guidelines, and a security policy.
    • New plotting functions for dilatometry data visualization and enhanced analysis functions.
    • Expanded the README with badges, detailed features, installation instructions, and a quick start section.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved import path issues across examples and modules.
  • Documentation

    • Improved clarity and structure of the README and changelog, including detailed usage examples and better organization.
    • Added a new section on citing the library and an acknowledgments section.

- Add installation and quick start sections
- Improve features description
- Add citation information
- Enhance overall structure and readability
- Add CHANGELOG.md in root directory
- Update version format to include 'v' prefix (e.g., v0.1.0)
- Transfer and format changelog content from docs
- Ensure consistent version history across files
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a CHANGELOG.md file to document notable changes in the project, following the "Keep a Changelog" format and Semantic Versioning. It details updates across multiple versions from v0.1.0 to v0.3.0, highlighting new features, fixes, and improvements. Additionally, the README.md file has been significantly enhanced for clarity and organization, including a new quick start section and detailed descriptions of the library's features. The docs/changelog.rst file has also been updated to reflect the transition to version 0.3.0, summarizing the changes and improvements made.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Introduced to document changes; added version entries for v0.3.0 to v0.1.0, detailing new features, fixes, and improvements across versions.
README.md Enhanced presentation; added badges, reorganized features section, clarified installation instructions, added quick start section, and included a citing section.
docs/changelog.rst Updated to reflect version transition from 0.2.3 to 0.3.0; summarized new features, fixes, and changes, including updates to previous versions.
.gitignore Added entries to ignore _version.py and .venv39 directories for better version control management.
STRUCTURE.md Removed from the project, eliminating the directory structure overview previously provided.

Possibly related PRs

  • fixed changelog docs #14: This PR addresses updates to the changelog documentation, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the introduction and updates of the CHANGELOG.md file.
  • changelog for release #22: This PR also updates the changelog for version 0.2.2, which is relevant as the main PR includes multiple version entries in the changelog, including those leading up to v0.3.0.

Poem

🐰 In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With changelogs bright, guiding the way.
Features bloom, like flowers in spring,
Clarity shines, oh what joy it brings!
So let’s dance in the code, with a joyful cheer,
For Pkynetics grows, year after year! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28ede14 and 34fc9bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .gitignore (2 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • STRUCTURE.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • STRUCTURE.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~72-~72: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2442 characters long)
Context: ...# Contributing We welcome contributions! Please read our: - [Contributing Guidel...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
README.md (6)

3-9: LGTM! Well-organized badges section.

The badges provide comprehensive project status information and are correctly linked to their respective resources.


15-42: LGTM! Well-structured features section.

The features are logically organized into clear subsections with consistent formatting.


64-74: LGTM! Documentation and contributing sections are well-organized.

The sections provide clear information and appropriate links. The enthusiastic tone in the contributing section is welcoming and appropriate.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~72-~72: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2442 characters long)
Context: ...# Contributing We welcome contributions! Please read our: - [Contributing Guidel...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


76-86: LGTM! Clear and concise policy sections.

The sections provide appropriate links to detailed documentation.


88-99: LGTM! Well-formatted citation information.

The BibTeX entry provides complete and accurate citation information.


48-48: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Standardize version format in installation command.

To maintain consistency with the PR's version formatting objective, consider updating the pip install command to include the version with 'v' prefix.

-pip install pkynetics
+pip install pkynetics==v0.3.0  # or latest version

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@PPeitsch PPeitsch linked an issue Dec 13, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
27 tasks
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

69-69: Add documentation note about manufacturer detection

Consider adding a note explaining the 'auto' manufacturer detection feature and when it should be used.

# Import TGA data
+# 'auto' automatically detects the manufacturer based on file format
data = tga_importer('path/to/data.csv', manufacturer='auto')
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec1f03d and 5b04067.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/changelog.rst (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~88-~88: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2630 characters long)
Context: ...# Contributing We welcome contributions! Please see our [Contributing Guidelines...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


[uncategorized] ~122-~122: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...lysis community for valuable feedback - Open source projects that made this possible

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
README.md (2)

88-93: LGTM!

The Contributing section is well-structured and provides clear guidance for potential contributors.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~88-~88: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 7 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2630 characters long)
Context: ...# Contributing We welcome contributions! Please see our [Contributing Guidelines...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


108-116: LGTM!

The BibTeX citation is well-formatted and includes all necessary fields for academic references.

docs/changelog.rst (2)

9-9: LGTM!

Version format is consistently applied with 'v' prefix across all entries, aligning with the PR objective.

Also applies to: 33-33, 58-58, 78-78, 88-88, 110-110


Line range hint 1-32: LGTM!

The RST formatting follows proper conventions with consistent header levels and underline characters.

CHANGELOG.md (2)

1-7: LGTM!

The changelog follows the Keep a Changelog format with proper Markdown syntax and clear references to the formatting guidelines.


8-107: LGTM!

The changelog content is consistent with changelog.rst, maintaining the same version numbers, dates, and changes across both files.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Owner Author

@PPeitsch PPeitsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

all ok

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

15-42: Consider standardizing bullet point formatting.

While the content structure is excellent, the bullet point formatting varies between sections. Consider standardizing the formatting:

 ### Data Import
-• Support for multiple thermal analysis instruments:
+- Support for multiple thermal analysis instruments:
   - TA Instruments
   - Mettler Toledo
   - Netzsch
   - Setaram
-• Flexible custom importer for non-standard formats
+- Flexible custom importer for non-standard formats

62-75: Enhance code example documentation.

The quick start example is clear but could benefit from more detailed inline comments explaining the significance of each step and expected outputs.

 # Import TGA data
+# Automatically detects and loads data from various manufacturer formats
 data = tga_importer('path/to/data.csv', manufacturer='auto')

 # Perform Kissinger analysis
+# Calculates activation energy (e_a) and pre-exponential factor (a)
+# Returns standard errors (se_) and coefficient of determination (r_squared)
 e_a, a, se_e_a, se_ln_a, r_squared = kissinger_method(data['temperature'], data['heating_rate'])

 # Visualize results
+# Generates Kissinger plot with fitted line and confidence intervals
 plot_kissinger(data['temperature'], data['heating_rate'], e_a, a, r_squared)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b04067 and 28ede14.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[style] ~87-~87: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2519 characters long)
Context: ...# Contributing We welcome contributions! Please see our [Contributing Guidelines...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)


[uncategorized] ~120-~120: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ...ments - Contributors and maintainers - The thermal analysis community for valuable...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_OF)


[uncategorized] ~121-~121: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...lysis community for valuable feedback - Open source projects that made this possible

(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

3-9: LGTM! Well-organized badges section.

The badges provide comprehensive coverage of key project metrics and follow a consistent format.


79-83: LGTM! Well-organized documentation links.

Documentation links are comprehensive and properly structured, providing easy access to all key resources.

Also applies to: 95-97

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
- Simplify and improve README organization
- Remove unnecessary wording and redundant content
- Fix methods listing for accuracy
- Add new badges and improve sections structure
- Remove STRUCTURE.md from root as it's not needed
@PPeitsch PPeitsch merged commit 5f22d7b into main Dec 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@PPeitsch PPeitsch deleted the docs/readme-changelog branch December 26, 2024 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Project Infrastructure Setup (Phase 1)
1 participant