-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PMID: 22314539 The T788G mutation in the cyp51C gene confers voriconazole resistance in Aspergillus flavus causing aspergillosis. #51
Comments
Fortunately the Af uniprot ref proteome is the same the control used in this paper. (NRRL3357). Uniprot help #175342 to add correct gene name to B8NUK6 CYP51c. |
Also requested uniprot gene names for |
@ValWood Please could you check this short chemistry paper once you have finished with Tox1/Snn1. |
I checked this one. Only one comment. I think amino acid mutation was selected for the genotytp[es, nut nucleotide mutations were reported ? I did not fix this because I don't know what you want to do. Even though there is a little more information in the nucleotide description, we always report the amino acids because biologist think in protein sequence alterations (and our users often only report the amino acid change). However, if the nucleotide alteration was reported we add this as a genotype note. |
The paper title also uses 'T788G mutation' |
Yes keep the names but describe as proteins seems good! Best of both worlds. |
Dear Alayne and Martin, Moreover, I've completed annotations for cyp51A and cyp51B from /Aspergillus fumigatus/, as well as for cyp51A, cyp51B and cyp51C from /Aspergillus flavus/. The modifications will be publicly available at the UniProt release around the 29-JAN-2019 (Release 2020_01). |
I don't think it matters, but if the example you include has it, then include it. Sometimes the "expressivity" is the only difference between similar alleles. On a related note, we changed "expressivity" to "severity". The community understood the meaning of "severity" better. Odd that this isn't in PHI-Canto. I will open a ticket for this. This has now been DONE and is visble in PHI-Canto |
This one can be approved after the gene name is updated |
Gene names have been updated. I have approved the session :-) I will close the ticket for now and it can always be retrieved if required for making the training video. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Nichola said there are is only Cyp51A and Cyp51B. Therefore the naming of Cyp51C in this paper is an error. To determine whether Cyp51C should be considered as Cyp51A or Cyp51B for the AE alteration in archetype we decided to use FRAST https://www.frast.com.au/. For FRAST we need the amino acid sequence in FASTA format. |
Aspergillus flavus Now, I will look to see if I can add AE alteration in archetype for Cyp51A (assuming this is the cyp51C named by authors) |
For Aspergillus flavus cyp51C-C1325A(aaP419T)[WT level] Codon 419 in the sequence index is 'P' which aligns with with archetype index codon 420 but a different wildtype AA 'T' in the Cyp51A archetype sequence. |
Nichola says these AEs' look ok. |
After discussion with Nichola, she recommended not using the UniProt download option to obtain an AA FASTA file. this is because there may be cases where the appropriate UniProt Id is not available. Instead use the following method
|
Just to note: I can open the MAFFT output from FRAST using the Geneious software. |
Chemistry paper curating with @martin2urban
curation link
https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/92ed9bf55f48e444
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: