Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PMID:28715477 The RhlR quorum-sensing receptor controls Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis and biofilm development independently of its canonical homoserine lactone autoinducer. #34

Closed
CuzickA opened this issue Aug 17, 2019 · 16 comments

Comments

@CuzickA
Copy link

CuzickA commented Aug 17, 2019

Link to curation session
https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/11fa7733063e791c

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Sep 11, 2019

@ValWood I have a couple of questions about the alleles for this paper

  1. I have some nonsense alleles with early STOP codons. I have not entered these before in PHI-Canto. Does below look reasonable? The allele name is what the authors use but is it repeated in the allele description so may not be necessary.
    image
    This is correct.

  2. In this bacterial pathogen two operons are deleted phz1 and phz2 each consisting of 7 genes. The authors then make a 'double mutant' of phz1 and phz2 called deltaphz.
    To make these three genotypes in PHI-Canto I think I will have to capture all the individual genes assuming they are all available in UniProt?? What are your thoughts on how to create these genotypes?
    deltaphz1 =7 genes
    deltaphz2 =7 genes
    deltaphz =14 genes
    image

Need to add all the UniProt ids here. Note: phzc1/2 , phze1/2 and phzf1/2 have the same uniprot id. eg O69754 has gene name phzf1 and phzf2

also see #10

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Sep 13, 2019

Query relating to future results display and phenotype hierarchy

image

In above, the 1st and 2nd annotation are 'abnormal colony morphology' and the 3rd annotation is a 'normal colony morphology'. This may not be clear to some when looking at just the 'child term' in the results display. We may need to consider this when designing the future 'gene display results'.

Change to 'hyper smooth colony morphology' and 'normal rugose colony morphology' b38a37d done

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Sep 13, 2019

Need 'assayed_with' config for RNA level phenotypes for this paper. Lost track of the GitHub ticket for this.

CuzickA added a commit to PHI-base/phipo that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2019
PHI-base/curation#34
updated term names for 'hyper-smooth colony morphology' and 'normal rugose colony morpholgy'
@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Sep 24, 2019

@ValWood This is ready for checking through. As discussed I haven't curated Fig 4 and 5 as I kinda ran out of steam and wasn't quite sure how to curate them -see what you think?

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented Nov 6, 2019

Looks good.

I tweaked the GO, and requested some specific regulation terms.

The rest looked fine.

I want to check the QS terms in a few days because GO have been working on them, but I don't think the changes are through yet.....

@ValWood ValWood removed their assignment Nov 6, 2019
@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented May 1, 2020

@ValWood do the GO terms still need updating for this session (as per last comment above)?

I have updated the media and timing conditions.
Still need to make a condition for below
image

@CuzickA CuzickA added the next label May 1, 2020
@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented May 2, 2020

I think the GO annotastion is OK, so you can approve. I need to change a term to -ve regulation, have requested. I can add that later

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented May 2, 2020

actually I think it's done. ignore the -ve reg

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented May 18, 2020

condition added

PHI-base/phi-eco@305ec45

@CuzickA CuzickA added approved and removed next labels May 19, 2020
@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented May 19, 2020

Session approved, closing ticket

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Nov 13, 2020

changed 'colony size' term annotations to population growth terms see PHI-base/phipo#206

image
to
image

image
to
image

This is now correct 17_11_2020

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Jan 18, 2021

image
now looks like this

Added control annotations and AE compared to control genotype and AE disease interaction to session.
no disease caused AE used in session

Session approved, closing ticket

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Feb 12, 2021

@jseager7 do you have a disease name associated with 'Pseudomonas aeruginosa' and 'Mus musculus'?

I have not entered anything under the 'Disease name' as I'm not sure what name to use here.

@jseager7
Copy link

jseager7 commented Feb 22, 2021

@CuzickA Here's the diseases we have in PHI-base for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mus musculus:

  • corneal infection
  • cystic fibrosis
  • infection
  • nosocomial infection
  • nosocomial pneumonia
  • opportunistic infection
  • pneumonia
  • septicemia
  • soft rot (?)
  • urinary tract infection

From the publication (Fig. 6) it looks like the mouse was subject to "intratracheal infection" and seems to have heavy bacterial load in the lungs; would 'pneumonia' be applicable?

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Feb 22, 2021

Thanks @jseager7

I agree 'pneumonia' is the best option. I'll add that to the session.

Interesting to see 'cystic fibrosis' in the list. I assume this will be removed in the future as discussed because this is not an infectious disease, it is a hereditary condition of the host.

@CuzickA
Copy link
Author

CuzickA commented Feb 22, 2021

Added
image

Approving session and closing ticket

@CuzickA CuzickA closed this as completed Mar 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants