-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PMID: 10919801 Tandem Repeat of a Transcriptional Enhancer Upstream of the Sterol 14α-Demethylase Gene (CYP51) in Penicillium digitatum #152
Comments
In this papers authors identify a tandem repeat in the promoter region of the CYP51 gene of DMI-resistant strains of Penicillium digitatum. This tandem repeat includes five copies of a 126 bp sequence, which is present as a single copy in the promoter of DMI-sensitive strains, such as PD5. Authors test whether the expression of extra copies of the CYP51prom::CYP51 amplified from both PD5 and a DMI-resistant strain (LC2) is capable of inducing increased resistance to fungicides when introduced in PD5 cells. |
Uniprot ID: accession number AB030178 provided by the authors is used to locate the CYP51 from PD5 in Uniprot (as PD5 is the reference and recipient strain). ID Q9P340 is located and selected for curation session. |
UPDATED FOLLOWING TRANSFORMANT ALLELE DISCUSSIONS: Genotypes and annotations: CYP51prom::CYP51 transformant (LC2-CYP51prom(5x126bp tandem repeat)::CYP51) [Ectopic]: expression of CYP51prom::CYP51 from LC2 in PD5 cells; 126 bp tandem repeats in promoter included in allele description. I considered choosing Ectopic as expression level to describe the expression of the extra copies of the gene; however, authors quantify expression levels of CYP51 and observe a slight increase for CYP51prom::CYP51+ and a more significant increase for lines expression CYP51prom::CYP51 transformant, so I believe overexpression is appropriate here. Endogenous CYP51 present was added to background. |
Genotypes were annotated with terms: |
Curation completed pending review. |
AE alteration_in _archetype Questions for Nichola I'm not sure about adding the AE alteration in archetype here, need to follow up with Nichola. I could use It is unclear as Penicillium digitatum gene is 'Cyp51'. |
New terms added, session approved. leaving ticket open as need to follow up with Nichola about adding the AE alteration in archetype here (see comment above). |
Use FRAST to determine if Cyp51A or B |
From the publication Look up AB030178 in Genbank gives https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AB030178 Created AA FASTA file in notepad. Tried to use FRAST option for 'automatic' input to see whether PdCYP51 closer to Cyp51 A or B. However, FRAST didn't work. No results were shown. Double checked method using info from #51 and this example did work. We still don't know whether to use Cyp51A or Cyp51B. |
After discussion with Nichola
|
Supplementary Table 2 from https://academic.oup.com/g3journal/article/12/11/jkac249/6709346 PMID: 36130263 Pd Cyp51A XP_014532172.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/XP_014532172.1 |
No need for FRAST as genotype has an alteration in the promoter which can be captured using 'Non-coding region' Two genotypes AE added to both Next steps
|
AE checked by Nichola - looks fine. Approving session and closing ticket. |
Curated by @MPiovesana.
https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/1e8f09364def576c#
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: