Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency @openzeppelin/defender-sdk-base-client to v2 #1106

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 18, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@openzeppelin/defender-sdk-base-client ^1.14.4 -> ^2.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

OpenZeppelin/defender-sdk (@​openzeppelin/defender-sdk-base-client)

v2.0.0

Compare Source

Major Changes
  • c288762: feat(simulation): Update simulation models (breaking change).
    feat(network): Add geist network support.
    feat(deploy): Include immutable references in extracted artifact.
    docs(examples): Add new example to repo.

v1.15.2

Patch Changes
  • f65079b: feat: Create SDK API for listing permissions of current api key.
    feat: Support update deployments.

v1.15.1

v1.15.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/@openzeppelin/defender-sdk-base-client@2.0.0 None 0 75.8 kB collins-oz

View full report↗︎

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants