Design Meeting Internal December 10, 2020

Date: December 10th, 2020 via Zoom

Participants

• Jamie H.
• Murray J
• Joost v.
• Tiegan H.
• Karolina P.
• Drew R.
• Will C.
• Malaika U.
• Nicky H.
• Sahar S.

Minutes

Review Tiegan’s feedback

• Maybe not start with a multi-hazard threat map

Review Murray’s feedback

• Starting with a map is preferable but agree that the content of the map needs to be carefully considered

Discussion:

Level of detail for user profiles

• planner would require something like what Murray as provided
• Jamie: this would be challenging for the Public
• Tiegan: our planner goal is not the well-resourced cities
• Malaika: this will be used to understand risk in a jurisdiction/community
  • We are not providing a workflow for planners
  • have a tool for a community to support mitigation funding

Sahar:

• I would expect an overview of risk for my city as a public user
• Let users drill down to address

Tiegan: general public, like temblor what is the risk to my asset and myself

• Sahar: absolutely
• Tiegan: smart phone in less than a minute
• Malaika: we need to be able to portray the risk in a way that makes sense to them
• Jamie: most people are interested in how things affect them - “what’s my risk”
  • probably not too interested in neighbours risk

Decision:

• we will support plann-agers (planners & emergency managers) AND public

Jamie:

• will do “address” and “muni” views
• national scale will be accessed through “by hazard”

Chat Notes

From Malaika U. to Everyone: (9:09 AM)
I like the postal code header, rather than census division which I don't think people relate to.


From Sahar S. to Everyone: (9:15 AM)
In high-density urban zone, the census divisions are small and the whole population would be exposed to hazards that are not very localized (EQ, Cyclone, flood).


From Sahar S. to Everyone: (9:32 AM)
file://Bitmap-report-East-Village-201908-Web.pdf 
This is my dream “risk profile”
I think this example of a profile talks both to the audience but also very useful for a planner


From Malaika U. to Everyone: (9:36 AM)

Sahar, I don't see that as a risk profile, but a community profile. Is there another section on risk?


From Sahar S. to Everyone: (9:36 AM)

Yes, it's not :)
But imagine this type of format provide all the risk information we know about a city


From Tiegan H. to Everyone: (9:47 AM)

I think we could definitely link to those resources! Like preparedBC, etc.


From Sahar S. to Everyone: (9:48 AM)

Yes, the public would definitely expect that.


From Tiegan H. to Everyone: (10:03 AM)

temblor.net