-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
not showing entire octomap #69
Comments
I also have the similar problem. It seems that the sensor_model/max_range is based on the fixed map frame, instead of the moving sensor frame(base_link). Which means if you set the max_range to 200 or more, or set the origin of the map frame in the middle of the octomap, you can see more of the octomap, but it is not a clean solution. |
But they suggest to set the input in the map frame and the sensor_model in this way seems to be in the centre of the map frame. How can we correct this problem? Should we just modify the sensor_model/max_range or have I bad understand ho to fed the input to the algorithm? |
Hey I have solved the problem. I had used the transformed pointcloud as input, which was actually wrong.
|
I'm working on a project where a UAV needs to map an entire outdoor environment. Running in gazebo, i've got rtabmap which creates a pointcloud, and its being converted to an octomap with octomap_server to have the ability to save it to a .bt file. The only problem is that when looking at the octomap that octomap_server creates, its not the entire pointcloud converted to an octomap but only a part.
my launchfile looks like this but I dont think that its got anything to do with that.
anybody any idea?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: