Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FIX] l10n_it_delivery_note rimosso script di migrazione per campo non più esistente is_carrier #3962

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

[FIX] l10n_it_delivery_note rimosso script di migrazione per campo non più esistente is_carrier #3962

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor

@sergiocorato sergiocorato commented Feb 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

A seguito di #3838

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MarcoCalcagni, @renda-dev, @aleuffre,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@francesco-ooops francesco-ooops mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2024
Closed
2 tasks
@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@sergiocorato una volta portata la #3838 sarà necessario anche per la 16?

@sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sergiocorato una volta portata la #3838 sarà necessario anche per la 16?

Sì, ti apro la issue

@sergiocorato
Copy link
Contributor Author

sergiocorato commented Feb 16, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@sergiocorato una volta portata la #3838 sarà necessario anche per la 16?

Sì, ti apro la issue

non serve, c'è la issue #3816 in cui è già referenziata questa [edit: che hai referenziato te ieri, devo cambiare ottico ;)]

PicchiSeba
PicchiSeba approved these changes Feb 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@PicchiSeba PicchiSeba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review: LGTM

aleuffre
aleuffre approved these changes Feb 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@aleuffre aleuffre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review, LGTM

@aleuffre
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 14.0-ocabot-merge-pr-3962-by-aleuffre-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 458f008 into OCA:14.0 Feb 23, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at e1fcdb8. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@andreampiovesana
Copy link
Contributor

per la 16 esiste il problema?

@francesco-ooops
Copy link
Contributor

@andreampiovesana entrambe le PR sono linkate nella stessa issue (nessuna delle due è stata portata in v16)

This was referenced May 27, 2024
Closed
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@aleuffre aleuffre aleuffre approved these changes

@PicchiSeba PicchiSeba PicchiSeba approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
14.0 approved merged 🎉 Migration scripts ready to merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@sergiocorato @OCA-git-bot @francesco-ooops @aleuffre @andreampiovesana @PicchiSeba