Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add in a basic plugin for dataframe UDF support in Apache Spark #11561

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

revans2
Copy link
Collaborator

@revans2 revans2 commented Oct 4, 2024

This adds in some very basic support for being able to do dataframe based UDFs in Apache Spark. There are still many more features that I would love to add to this, like type checking and dynamic dispatch based on input types. But for now this is good enough.

Signed-off-by: Robert (Bobby) Evans <bobby@apache.org>
@revans2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

revans2 commented Oct 4, 2024

build

df_udf/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
df_udf/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
df_udf/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
df_udf/pom.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
df_udf/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@revans2 revans2 changed the base branch from branch-24.10 to branch-24.12 October 7, 2024 13:13
Signed-off-by: Robert (Bobby) Evans <bobby@apache.org>
jlowe
jlowe previously approved these changes Oct 7, 2024
@revans2 revans2 dismissed jlowe’s stale review October 7, 2024 17:19

The merge-base changed after approval.

@revans2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

revans2 commented Oct 7, 2024

build

@revans2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

revans2 commented Oct 7, 2024

build

@revans2 revans2 merged commit 6897713 into NVIDIA:branch-24.12 Oct 8, 2024
45 checks passed
@sameerz sameerz added the feature request New feature or request label Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants