Adds script for fulfilling schism data requests #610
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nickchadwick-noaa
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2024
nickchadwick-noaa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2024
All is pretty much in the title. In the past 6 months or so I have received two requests for schism (coastal) FIM data. I was foolish and didn't formalize the work I had done on the first request, so when this second one came in (see ticket #609), I made sure to save the work. So here it is. This script could be made more generic-user friendly, but as it stands now, a user would only need to modify lines 546 through 564 with the specifics per the request.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All is pretty much in the title. In the past 6 months or so I have received two requests for schism (coastal) FIM data. I was foolish and didn't formalize the work I had done on the first request, so when this second one came in (see ticket #609), I made sure to save the work. So here it is.
This script could be made more generic-user friendly, but as it stands now, a user would only need to modify lines 546 through 564 with the specifics per the request.