-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subclass ResourcePools #435
Conversation
f57c3cb
to
8c92acb
Compare
let(:resource_pool_stub) { migration_stub(:ResourcePool) } | ||
|
||
migration_context :up do | ||
it "migrates resource pools from all supported providers" do |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would probably also be good to have a test for a record that isn't changed by the migration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 done
8c92acb
to
5ec9b3d
Compare
Checked commits agrare/manageiq-schema@1dcf0e4~...5ec9b3d with ruby 2.5.5, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0 db/migrate/20191118161319_subclass_resource_pools.rb
|
This broke the UI 😢, see ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#6425 |
@skateman we tested this with the other PRs linked to make sure the UI was still working with all of the PRs applied. Just got caught in the middle of a set of PRs |
There are some provider specifics to ResourcePools which should not live in core
Core issue: ManageIQ/manageiq#19529