With respect to coding conventions used when writing code for SMTK, please look here for more information.
The remainder of this page documents how to develop SMTK using Git. See the README for more information.
Git is an extremely powerful version control tool that supports many different "workflows" for individual development and collaboration. Here we document procedures used by the SMTK development community. In the interest of simplicity and brevity we do not provide an explanation of why we use this approach.
Before you begin, perform initial setup:
-
Register GitLab Access to create an account and select a user name.
-
Fork SMTK into your user's namespace on GitLab.
-
Follow the download instructions to create a local clone of the main SMTK repository. Optionally configure Git to use SSH instead of HTTPS. Then clone:
$ git clone --recursive https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmb/smtk.git SMTK $ cd SMTK
The main repository will be configured as your
origin
remote. -
Run the developer setup script to prepare your SMTK work tree and create Git command aliases used below:
$ ./utilities/SetupForDevelopment.sh
This will prompt for your GitLab user name and configure a remote called
gitlab
to refer to it. -
(Optional but highly recommended.) Register with the SMTK project on Kitware's CDash instance to better know how your code performs in regression tests. After registering and signing in, click on "All Dashboards" link in the upper left corner, scroll down and click "Subscribe to this project" on the right of SMTK.
SMTK development uses a branchy workflow based on topic branches. Our collaboration workflow consists of three main steps:
-
Local Development:
-
Code Review (requires GitLab Access):
-
Integrate Changes:
- Merge a Topic (requires permission in GitLab)
- Delete a Topic
-
Update your local
master
branch:$ git checkout master $ git pullall
-
Optionally push
master
to your fork in GitLab:$ git push gitlab master
to keep it in sync.
All new work must be committed on topic branches. Name topics like you might name functions: concise but precise. A reader should have a general idea of the feature or fix to be developed given just the branch name. Additionally, it is preferred to have an issue associated with every topic. The issue can document the bug or feature to be developed. In such cases, being your topic name with the issue number.
-
To start a new topic branch:
$ git fetch origin
If there is an issue associated with the topic, assign the issue to yourself using the "Assignee" field, and add the
workflow:active-development
label to it. -
For new development, start the topic from
origin/master
:$ git checkout -b my-topic origin/master
If subdmodules may have changed, the run:
$ git submodule update
-
Edit files and create commits (repeat as needed):
$ edit file1 file2 file3 $ git add file1 file2 file3 $ git commit
Commit messages must contain a brief description as the first line and a more detailed description of what the commit contains. If the commit contains a new feature, the detailed message must describe the new feature and why it is needed. If the commit contains a bug fix, the detailed message must describe the bug behavior, its underlying cause, and the approach to fix it. If the bug is described in the bug tracker, the commit message must contain a reference to the bug number.
When a topic is ready for review and possible inclusion, share it by pushing to a fork of your repository in GitLab. Be sure you have registered and signed in for GitLab Access and created your fork by visiting the main SMTK GitLab repository page and using the "Fork" button in the upper right.
-
Checkout the topic if it is not your current branch:
$ git checkout my-topic
-
Check what commits will be pushed to your fork in GitLab:
$ git prepush
-
Push commits in your topic branch to your fork in GitLab:
$ git push gitlab HEAD
Notes:
- If you are revising a previously pushed topic and have rewritten the
topic history, add
-f
or--force
to overwrite the destination.
The output will include a link to the topic branch in your fork in GitLab and a link to a page for creating a Merge Request.
- If you are revising a previously pushed topic and have rewritten the
topic history, add
(If you already created a merge request for a given topic and have reached this step after revising it, skip to the next step.)
Visit your fork in GitLab, browse to the "Merge Requests" link on the left, and use the "New Merge Request" button in the upper right to reach the URL printed at the end of the previous step. It should be of the form:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/<username>/smtk/-/merge_requests/new
Follow these steps:
-
In the "Source branch" box select the
<username>/smtk
repository and themy-topic
branch. -
In the "Target branch" box select the
cmb/smtk
repository and themaster
branch. It should be the default. -
Use the "Compare branches" button to proceed to the next page and fill out the merge request creation form.
-
In the "Title" field provide a one-line summary of the entire topic. This will become the title of the Merge Request.
Example Merge Request Title:
Wrapping: Add OpenCascade 1.x support
-
In the "Description" field provide a high-level description of the change the topic makes and any relevant information about how to try it.
- Use
@username
syntax to draw attention of specific developers. This syntax may be used anywhere outside literal text and code blocks. Or, wait until the next step and add comments to draw attention of developers. - Optionally use a fenced code block with type
message
to specify text to be included in the generated merge commit message when the topic is merged.
Example Merge Request Description:
This branch requires OpenCascade 1.x which is not generally available yet. Get OpenCascade 1.x from ... in order to try these changes. ```message Add support for OpenCascade 1.x to the model infrastructure. ``` Cc: @user1 @user2
- Use
-
The "Assign to", "Milestone", and "Labels" fields may be left blank.
-
Use the "Submit merge request" button to create the merge request and visit its page.
Add comments mentioning specific developers using @username
syntax to
draw their attention and have the topic reviewed. After typing @
and
some text, GitLab will offer completions for developers whose real names
or user names match.
Comments use GitLab Flavored Markdown for formatting. See GitLab documentation on Special GitLab References to add links to things like merge requests and commits in other repositories.
When a merge request is ready for review, developers can use the
triage:ready-for-review
to indicate the same to the reviewers. If reviewers
deem that it needs more work, they can add the triage:merge-needs-work
label.
This can be repeated as many times as needed adding/removing labels as
appropriate.
If a merge request is waiting on dashboards, use the triage:pending-dashboards
label.
Reviewers may add comments providing feedback or to acknowledge their approval. Lines of specific forms will be extracted during merging and included as trailing lines of the generated merge commit message:
The leading line of a comment may optionally be exactly one of the following votes followed by nothing but whitespace before the end of the line:
-1
or 👎 (:-1:
) means "The change is not ready for integration."+1
or 👍 (:+1:
) means "I've reviewed the source changes and they look good."+2
means "I've reviewed and compiled the changes and they look good."+3
means "I have tested the change and verified it works."
Note: In the case of large commits, several reviewers may be involved. In these cases each reviewer should document which section of the commit their comments pertain to.
The middle lines of a comment may be free-form GitLab Flavored Markdown.
Zero or more trailing lines of a comment may each contain exactly one of the following votes followed by nothing but whitespace before the end of the line:
Rejected-by: me
means "The change is not ready for integration."Acked-by: me
means "I've reviewed the source changes and they look good."Reviewed-by: me
means "I've reviewed and compiled the changes and they look good."Tested-by: me
means "I have tested the change and verified it works."
Each me
reference may instead be an @username
reference or a full
Real Name <user@domain>
reference to credit someone else for performing
the review. References to me
and @username
will automatically be
transformed into a real name and email address according to the user's
GitLab account profile.
One may fetch the changes associated with a merge request by using
the git fetch
command line shown at the top of the Merge Request
page. It is of the form:
$ git fetch https://gitlab.kitware.com/$username/cmb.git $branch
This updates the local FETCH_HEAD
to refer to the branch.
There are a few options for checking out the changes in a work tree:
-
One may checkout the branch:
$ git checkout FETCH_HEAD -b $branch
or checkout the commit without creating a local branch:
$ git checkout FETCH_HEAD
-
Or, one may cherry-pick the commits to minimize rebuild time:
$ git cherry-pick ..FETCH_HEAD
The "Kitware Robot" automatically performs basic checks on the commits and adds a comment acknowledging or rejecting the topic. This will be repeated automatically whenever the topic is pushed to your fork again. A re-check may be explicitly requested by adding a comment with a single trailing line:
Do: check
A topic cannot be merged until the automatic review succeeds.
If format issues have been detected, you can request that the merge request be reformatted using the following command:
Do: Reformat
This will reformat your merge request and allow you to compare the new version with the original. Note that the reformatting process rewrites your merge request's history instead of adding an adding a new commit. To retrieve these changes, you will need to fetch from your gitlab remote and do a hard reset.
CMB has a buildbot instance watching for merge requests to test. A developer must issue a command to buildbot to enable builds:
Do: test
The buildbot user (@buildbot) will respond with a comment linking to the CDash results when it schedules builds.
The Do: test
command accepts the following arguments:
--oneshot
only build the current hash of the branch; updates will not be built using this command--stop
clear the list of commands for the merge request--superbuild
build the superbuilds related to the project--clear
clear previous commands before adding this command--regex-include <arg>
or-i <arg>
only build on builders matching<arg>
(a Python regular expression)--regex-exclude <arg>
or-e <arg>
excludes builds on builders matching<arg>
(a Python regular expression)
Multiple Do: test
commands may be given. Upon each update to the branch,
buildbot will reconsider all of the active commands to determine which builders
to schedule.
Builder names always follow this pattern:
project@branch-host-os-libtype-buildtype+feature1+feature2
- project: always
cmb
for cmb - branch: the branch being built (e.g.,
master
orrelease
) - host: the buildbot host
- os: one of
windows
,osx
, orlinux
- libtype:
shared
orstatic
- buildtype:
release
ordebug
- feature: alphabetical list of features enabled for the build
For a list of all builders, see:
If a topic is approved during GitLab review, skip to the next step. Otherwise, revise the topic and push it back to GitLab for another review as follows:
-
Checkout the topic if it is not your current branch:
$ git checkout my-topic
-
To revise the 3rd commit back on the topic:
$ git rebase -i HEAD~3
(Substitute the correct number of commits back, as low as
1
.) Follow Git's interactive instructions. -
Return to the above step to share the revised topic.
After a topic has been reviewed and approved in a GitLab Merge Request, authorized developers may add a comment of the form
Do: merge
to ask that the change be merged into the upstream repository. By
convention, do not request a merge if any -1
or Rejected-by:
review comments have not been resolved and superseded by at least
+1
or Acked-by:
review comments from the same user.
Developers are encouraged to merge their own merge requests on review. However, please do not merge unless you are available to address any dashboard issues that may arise. Developers who repeatedly ignore dashboard issues following their merges may loose developer privileges to the repository temporarily (or permanently)!
If the merge succeeds the topic will appear in the upstream repository
master
branch and the Merge Request will be closed automatically.
Any issues associated with the Merge Request will generally get closed
automatically. If not, the developer merging the changes should close such issues
and add a workflow:customer-review
tag to the issue(s) addressed by the change.
Reporters and testers can then review the fix. Try to add enough information to
the Issue or the Merge Request to indicate how to test the functionality if not
obvious from the original Issue.
If the merge fails (likely due to a conflict), a comment will be added describing the failure. In the case of a conflict, fetch the latest upstream history and rebase on it:
$ git fetch origin
$ git rebase origin/master
Return to the above step to share the revised topic.
After a topic has been merged upstream the Merge Request will be closed. Now you may delete your copies of the branch.
-
In the GitLab Merge Request page a "Remove Source Branch" button will appear. Use it to delete the
my-topic
branch from your fork in GitLab. -
In your work tree checkout and update the
master
branch:$ git checkout master $ git pull
-
Delete the local topic branch:
$ git branch -d my-topic
The
branch -d
command works only when the topic branch has been correctly merged. Use-D
instead of-d
to force the deletion of an unmerged topic branch (warning - you could lose commits).
If you have any CMB, VTK or ParaView changes, then you are required to get your changes incorporated into CMB using CMB's development workflow, VTK using VTK's development workflow and/or into ParaView using ParaView's development workflow.