-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split Octonion
into another package?
#90
Comments
I agree, but also, I don't see major benefits from splitting Probably |
It seems no GitHub-hosted packages use Octonions in package code. LinearMaps.jl uses it in their tests. This is a good argument for moving Octonions to its own package. Do octonions have geometric applications? Should an Octonions.jl package live in JuliaGeometry as well or moved to an org like JuliaMath? |
Currently, I don't have applications for |
As others commented on Slack, either JuliaMath or JuliaGeometry would be a good host org for this package, though JuliaGeometry might make more sense due to its historical connections to the Quaternions package. Neither of us have rights in these orgs, but we don't need to to make the package and register it; it's easy to migrate the package to an org after registration. I do think it's important to preserve the contribution history, which we can do with |
I see. I don't have experience with |
I've created the repo at https://github.com/sethaxen/Octonions.jl and invited you to be a collaborator. |
I registered the package as-is to start the clock for the 3-day embargo: JuliaRegistries/General#68578. We can make any other changes we like after the initial release. |
I think the practical uses of
Quaternion
andOctonion
are totally different, and these types don't have to be provided in one package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: