You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would you consider having an alternative Spherical coordinate conventions, in particular the one which (at least according to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system#Conventions) is common practice in physics (i.e. x = [r sin(theta) cos(phi), r sin(\theta)sin(\phi), r cos(theta)]). This could live along the current convention like SphericalPhysics or PhysicsSpherical, or by adding a type parameter which indicates the convention Spherical{T,A, Convension}?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would you consider having an alternative Spherical coordinate conventions, in particular the one which (at least according to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system#Conventions) is common practice in physics (i.e. x = [r sin(theta) cos(phi), r sin(\theta)sin(\phi), r cos(theta)]). This could live along the current convention like
SphericalPhysics
orPhysicsSpherical
, or by adding a type parameter which indicates the conventionSpherical{T,A, Convension}
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: