-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error #516
Error #516
Conversation
@codewarnab Please review. |
1 similar comment
@codewarnab Please review. |
@codewarnab Please review asap. |
we only perefer tailwind for this type of pages not css at max inline css is ok , and also file name should be not found not error page , try to create a fresh fork and put your chanages theri ( tailwind only) |
Okay. |
@codewarnab Here is the updated Not Found Page which is made by using tailwind css, Please have a look Screencast.from.2024-07-09.23-04-31.webm |
@codewarnab Please review it. |
will review it tommorow |
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the structure and functionality of a React application, introducing a new 404 Not Found page and refining overall code quality. Modifications include improved styling in CSS, the addition of a Vite development script, and clearer code formatting in JavaScript files. These updates aim to improve user experience and streamline development while maintaining existing functionality. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (6)
- index.html (2 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/App.css (3 hunks)
- src/App.jsx (4 hunks)
- src/NotFoundPage.jsx (1 hunks)
- tailwind.config.js (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- index.html
- src/App.jsx
- src/NotFoundPage.jsx
Additional comments not posted (12)
package.json (1)
60-60
: Addition of thedev
script looks good.The
"dev": "vite"
script entry is correctly added and aligns with the existing structure.src/App.css (6)
11-13
: Ensurebox-sizing: inherit
is necessary.The universal selector (
*
) now includesbox-sizing: inherit;
. This change ensures consistency in the box model calculation, but make sure it doesn't conflict with other styles.
67-71
: Styling for.container
looks good.The
.container
class now features margin, border-radius, and box-shadow, enhancing the visual appeal.
73-76
: Styling for.form-title
looks good.The
.form-title
class has been introduced with appropriate styling to emphasize form titles.
78-81
: Styling for.input-field
looks good.The
.input-field
class has been introduced with defined margins and padding to improve spacing and usability.
83-85
: Styling for.button-container
looks good.The
.button-container
class has been introduced with a margin to improve spacing.
87-89
: Styling for.additional-links
looks good.The
.additional-links
class has been introduced with a margin to improve spacing.tailwind.config.js (5)
6-6
: Addition of"./index.html"
to the content array looks good.This ensures that Tailwind CSS applies styles to the HTML file.
56-57
: Transition delay settings look good.The transition delay settings have been correctly added.
60-72
: Keyframes definitions look good.The keyframes for
fade-in
,zoom-in
, andzoom-out
have been correctly defined.
73-82
: Screen size settings look good.The screen size settings have been correctly defined.
83-89
: Animation settings look good.The animation settings have been correctly defined.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Hi @codewarnab ,
I hope you're doing well. I've addressed the issue #512 and created a pull request to resolve it.
Could you please review the PR and let me know if any adjustments are needed?
Best regards,
Tanisha Garg
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
NotFoundPage
for handling 404 errors, enhancing navigation experience."dev": "vite"
), streamlining the development workflow.Bug Fixes
Style
Documentation