Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: add s3 upload action #224

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

ci: add s3 upload action #224

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

billyjacoby
Copy link
Collaborator

@billyjacoby billyjacoby commented Jan 31, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a GitHub Actions workflow for automated file uploads to S3.
    • Configured deployment triggers for manual and branch push events.
  • Chores

    • Updated .gitignore to exclude .secrets files.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow has been created to automate file uploads to an S3 bucket. The workflow, named "Injective list - Upload Files", is designed to trigger on manual dispatch or pushes to the master branch. It includes conditional execution logic based on commit message content and provides steps for AWS credential configuration and file synchronization. Additionally, a .secrets entry has been added to the .gitignore file to prevent sensitive information from being tracked by Git.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/upload.yaml New workflow added for S3 file uploads with conditional deployment logic
.gitignore Added .secrets entry to ignore sensitive files

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of workflows bright,
Uploading files with AWS might!
Secrets hidden, commits so neat,
S3 buckets now look so sweet 🚀
Deployment dance, a GitHub delight!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml (2)

3-11: Consider restricting the workflow trigger conditions.

The workflow currently triggers on any push to master and allows manual dispatch. Consider:

  1. Using path filters to trigger only when relevant files change
  2. Adding environment protection rules for the master branch

Add path filters to make the workflow more focused:

 on:
   workflow_dispatch:
   push:
     branches:
       - master
+    paths:
+      - 'json/**'

54-56: Add error handling and validation for S3 sync.

The S3 sync command should include error handling and validation to ensure the operation was successful.

Add error checking and validation:

 - name: Sync files to S3 bucket
   run: |
+    if [ ! -d "json" ]; then
+      echo "Error: json directory not found"
+      exit 1
+    fi
     aws s3 sync json s3://injective-lists/json --delete
+    if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+      echo "Error: S3 sync failed"
+      exit 1
+    fi
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 56-56: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8baa844 and 19a2a9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/upload.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml

48-48: the runner of "aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml

[warning] 39-39: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)


[error] 43-43: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 56-56: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml (2)

21-27: Consider removing or documenting the sleep step.

The comment indicates uncertainty about the necessity of the sleep step. If this is for rate limiting or dependency purposes, it should be documented clearly. Otherwise, consider removing it to improve workflow execution time.

Could you clarify why this sleep step is necessary? If it's not critical, we should remove it to optimize the workflow execution time.


29-42: LGTM: Local testing setup is well structured.

The conditional installation of dependencies for local testing with ACT is well implemented. The comments clearly explain the purpose of these steps.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 39-39: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)

.github/workflows/upload.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/upload.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml (3)

9-11: Consider improving job condition readability.

The complex condition could be simplified by breaking it into multiple lines and using GitHub's expression syntax more effectively.

 jobs:
   deploy:
-    if: ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' || contains(github.event.commits[0].message, 'generate json files') && !contains(github.event.commits[0].message, 'skip deploy') }}
+    if: |
+      github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
+      (contains(github.event.commits[0].message, 'generate json files') &&
+       !contains(github.event.commits[0].message, 'skip deploy'))

31-33: Improve local testing setup reliability.

The current apt-get commands might fail in some environments. Consider using a more robust approach.

-          apt-get update && apt-get install sudo -y && apt-get install wget -y && apt-get install unzip -y
+          apt-get update && \
+          DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get install -y \
+            sudo \
+            wget \
+            unzip

38-38: Fix YAML formatting issues.

There are several formatting issues in the file:

  1. Incorrect indentation on line 38
  2. Trailing spaces on line 42
  3. Missing newline at end of file
-            version: 2                         # default
+          version: 2                         # default

-    
+
     - name: Checkout

-            aws s3 sync json s3://injective-lists/json --delete
+            aws s3 sync json s3://injective-lists/json --delete
+

Also applies to: 42-42, 55-55

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[warning] 38-38: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19a2a9a and fef0722.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/upload.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml

[warning] 38-38: wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12

(indentation)


[error] 42-42: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 55-55: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/upload.yaml (1)

20-25: Verify the necessity of the sleep step.

The comment indicates uncertainty about the sleep step's necessity. If this is for rate limiting or dependency purposes, consider:

  1. Documenting the specific reason for the delay
  2. Reducing the sleep duration if possible
  3. Removing it if not required
✅ Verification successful

Sleep step appears to be a legitimate deployment pattern

The 60-second sleep step is consistently implemented in both the upload and deploy workflows, suggesting it serves a specific purpose in the deployment process. While the exact reason isn't documented, its presence in both workflows indicates it's an intentional pattern rather than an unnecessary addition.

Recommendation:

  • Document the specific reason for this delay in both workflow files to prevent future confusion
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any rate limits or dependencies in the codebase that might require this delay
rg -i "rate limit|throttle|delay" .

Length of output: 1654


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find deploy script and other workflow files with sleep actions
echo "=== Searching for deploy script ==="
fd deploy -t f

echo -e "\n=== Checking workflows for sleep patterns ==="
rg -i "sleep|wait" .github/workflows/

echo -e "\n=== Checking deploy script content if found ==="
fd deploy -t f -x cat {}

Length of output: 654

.github/workflows/upload.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant