-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
ca28ee1
commit 3522253
Showing
1 changed file
with
54 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1,54 @@ | ||
# Microarray_Mtb | ||
# Microarray gene expression analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Project description: | ||
|
||
Our project investigated 177 genes across 287 conditions using different treatments, | ||
antibiotics, and chemical agents to identify the genes involved in a biological process that | ||
could be inferred the similar expression levels and the regulatory networks between the genes | ||
among the conditions. | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Analysis workflow: | ||
|
||
#### 1. Initial analysis: | ||
|
||
We imported data into R for analysis. We determined the number for genes and conditions in our | ||
data. We made a Q-Qplot to test for normality in our data. We identified and imputed missing | ||
data points using impute R package. | ||
|
||
#### 2. PCA and Gene Correlation analysis: | ||
|
||
We analysed variance-covariance structure and determined percent of variance explained by each | ||
Principal component. We also analysed the degree of association between genes using a heatmap | ||
of gene correlation. | ||
|
||
#### 3. Gene distance Clustering Analysis: | ||
|
||
We performed hierarchical Euclidean distance clustering of genes and made a dendrogram to | ||
visualize the grouping of genes in our data. | ||
|
||
#### 4. Network Inference Analysis: | ||
|
||
We used minet package for constructing networks. We used three methods for comparison; clr, | ||
mrnet, and aracne. We wrote out the resulting networks to a table for further analysis in | ||
CytoScape. | ||
|
||
#### 5. Network Property Analysis with CytoScape: | ||
|
||
We imported the network table into CytoScape, we optimised the threshold for each network | ||
until we obtained an easily interpretable network. We settled on a threshold of 0.25 for clr, | ||
0.1 for mrnet, for some reason changing threshold did not seem to affect aracne network. For | ||
this reason, we did not proceed with network from aracne. | ||
|
||
#### 6. Network Cluster Analysis: | ||
|
||
We explored network properties using analyse network tool in CytoScape. We used clusterONE app | ||
to determine clusters in our network. | ||
|
||
#### 7. GO Biological Processes: | ||
|
||
We analysed the GO biological processes and molecular functions associated with the clusters | ||
using Bingo. |